On 1 October 1960, Nigeria gained independence from Britain and began a new chapter of self-government under a parliamentary constitution. Yet, within six years, Nigeria’s First Republic had collapsed following a series of political and constitutional crises. Disputes over population figures, parliamentary representation, regional authority and electoral procedures contributed to the instability that preceded the military coup of January 1966.
The crises developed within a federation whose principal political parties drew much of their support from different regions. Population statistics were particularly important because they influenced parliamentary representation and the allocation of public resources.
The controversies surrounding the 1962 and 1963 censuses, followed by the disputed federal election of 1964 and the Western Region election of 1965, exposed deep disagreements over political authority and the administration of democratic institutions.
Understanding how these events unfolded provides an important account of the challenges Nigeria faced during its early years of independence.
Nigeria’s First Republic and the Struggle for Political Representation
At independence, Nigeria operated a parliamentary system in which executive authority rested principally with the Prime Minister and his government.
Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa served as Prime Minister, while Dr Nnamdi Azikiwe became Governor-General. When Nigeria became a republic on 1 October 1963, Azikiwe assumed the presidency, and Balewa continued as Prime Minister.
Three major political parties dominated the country’s early post-independence political landscape.
EXPLORE NOW: Democratic Nigeria
The Northern People’s Congress (NPC), led by Sir Ahmadu Bello, maintained its principal electoral base in Northern Nigeria.
The National Council of Nigeria and the Cameroons (NCNC), subsequently renamed the National Convention of Nigerian Citizens, was associated with Azikiwe and maintained substantial support in the Eastern Region.
The Action Group (AG), led by Chief Obafemi Awolowo, was particularly influential in the Western Region.
Although these parties sought support beyond their regional strongholds, the geographical concentration of their electoral bases gave regional interests considerable importance in federal politics.
The NPC and NCNC formed the principal governing coalition at independence, while the Action Group became the main federal opposition party.
Under the parliamentary system, the distribution of seats in the federal House of Representatives affected the formation of governments and the balance of political authority.
Population figures therefore had implications beyond demographic planning. They influenced parliamentary representation, public expenditure and the distribution of resources among the regions.
The Northern Region’s recorded population gave it a substantial share of federal parliamentary seats. Any census that significantly altered the relative populations of the regions could consequently affect their political representation.
This relationship between population and political power formed the background to the census controversies of the early 1960s.
The 1962 Census: A Population Count That Divided the Federation
Nigeria conducted its first post-independence population census in May 1962.
The exercise was intended to provide updated demographic information for national planning, parliamentary representation and electoral administration.
However, the preliminary results generated considerable controversy.
According to the National Population Commission’s historical account, the preliminary census figures placed Nigeria’s population at approximately 45.26 million.
Northern Nigeria was assigned approximately 22.01 million inhabitants, while the remaining regions together accounted for approximately 23.25 million.
These figures placed the Northern Region below half the recorded national population.
The result challenged the demographic balance underlying the existing distribution of parliamentary seats and generated disagreement over its possible consequences for federal representation.
Northern political leaders challenged the figures, while concerns were also raised about the reliability of returns from other regions.
The controversy involved allegations of inflated population figures, incomplete enumeration returns and disagreements over the methods used to assess population growth.
The federal census officer questioned the plausibility of the Eastern Region’s reported growth and identified incomplete returns from the Western Region.
The disagreement was therefore not confined to the Northern Region’s objections.
The 1962 census figures were never adopted as an accepted national population count.
EXPLORE NOW: Biographies & Cultural Icons of Nigeria
Prime Minister Balewa’s government eventually cancelled the exercise and ordered a replacement census.
The cancellation prevented the disputed results from becoming the officially accepted demographic basis for subsequent government decisions.
However, it did not settle the underlying disagreements over population distribution, parliamentary representation and the reliability of the country’s census procedures.
The 1963 Census: A Second Count and Another Political Controversy
A replacement population census was conducted from 5 to 8 November 1963.
Unlike the previous exercise, which extended over a longer period, the new census was concentrated into four days to reduce opportunities for repeated counting.
Responsibility for the exercise was assigned to a newly established Census Board involving regional representatives and statistical expertise.
The new arrangements included statistical checks designed to assess the reliability of the enumeration returns.
The 1963 census produced a national population figure of approximately 55.67 million.
Northern Nigeria was assigned approximately 29.8 million inhabitants, restoring its recorded majority of the national population.
The Eastern Region was assigned approximately 12.39 million people, while the newly established Mid-Western Region was recorded as having approximately 2.5 million inhabitants.
The substantial differences between the preliminary 1962 returns and the 1963 results generated renewed controversy.
The figures did not represent an actual population increase of approximately ten million people within eighteen months. They were the results of two disputed enumeration exercises whose reliability remained the subject of political and statistical disagreement.
The Eastern Region Challenges the Results
Chief Michael Okpara, Premier of the Eastern Region, rejected the 1963 census results.
His objections included allegations concerning the enumeration process, the statistical testing of returns and the treatment of population figures recorded in individual census districts.
He questioned aspects of the Northern Region’s returns and the methods used to establish the accepted figures.
The controversy extended beyond the Eastern and Northern regions.
The Northern and Western regional governments accepted the results, while the Eastern and Mid-Western governments initially rejected them.
Chief Dennis Osadebay, Premier of the Mid-Western Region, subsequently accepted the figures, leaving the Eastern Government isolated in its continuing opposition.
The changing positions of the regional governments reflected the wider political realignments taking place within the federation.
In the Western Region, Samuel Ladoke Akintola had developed a political relationship with the NPC following the divisions within the Action Group.
Meanwhile, disagreements between the NPC and NCNC were weakening the governing partnership at the federal level.
The census controversy became connected to these broader struggles over regional influence, political alliances and the distribution of federal resources.
Although the Federal Government ultimately adopted the 1963 figures for official purposes, political disagreement over their reliability continued.
The 1964 Supreme Court Case: The Census Dispute Reaches the Judiciary
The Eastern Government’s objections eventually reached the Supreme Court of Nigeria.
In Attorney-General, Eastern Nigeria v Attorney-General of the Federation, the Eastern Government challenged the Federal Government’s acceptance of the 1963 census results.
The consolidated proceedings, numbered SC 231/1964 and SC 232/1964, resulted in a judgment delivered on 29 June 1964.
The Eastern Government sought declarations preventing the Federal Government from accepting or acting upon the disputed population figures.
Its arguments concerned the legality of the census arrangements and the potential consequences of the figures for parliamentary representation and financial allocations.
The constitutional questions included whether a region possessed a legal right to a particular number of federal parliamentary constituencies and the extent to which the courts could intervene in decisions concerning monetary grants to the regions.
The Supreme Court examined the legal basis of the Eastern Government’s claims and the limits of its original jurisdiction under the 1963 Constitution.
The proceedings did not amount to an independent demographic recount of Nigeria’s population.
The Federal Government’s subsequent use of the 1963 figures established their administrative status, but the controversy over the reliability of the census remained part of Nigeria’s wider political disagreements.
The 1964 Federal Election: Political Rivalries Become a Constitutional Crisis
By 1964, the political alliances that had shaped Nigeria’s early independence years had changed significantly.
The Northern People’s Congress had developed a partnership with Akintola’s Nigerian National Democratic Party (NNDP) and other political organisations.
Together, they formed the Nigerian National Alliance (NNA).
The NCNC, Action Group and additional opposition organisations formed the United Progressive Grand Alliance (UPGA).
EXPLORE: Nigerian Civil War
These two alliances became the principal competitors in the federal parliamentary election scheduled for 30 December 1964.
However, the election was preceded by disputes over candidate nominations, electoral administration and the uncontested return of candidates in some constituencies.
Opposition parties complained that their candidates had been prevented from contesting certain seats, particularly in Northern Nigeria.
A contemporary United States government memorandum dated 30 December 1964 recorded that UPGA representatives were challenging the uncontested return of 68 parliamentary candidates in the North.
The memorandum also documented a disagreement between President Azikiwe and Prime Minister Balewa over whether the election should proceed.
Azikiwe favoured postponement because of the electoral controversy, while Balewa insisted that polling should take place as scheduled.
The UPGA subsequently boycotted the election, disrupting voting in the Eastern Region and parts of Lagos and the Mid-Western Region.
Polling nevertheless proceeded elsewhere.
The disputed election created a constitutional disagreement over the formation of a new federal government.
Balewa was subsequently reappointed Prime Minister, and outstanding elections were conducted in March 1965 in constituencies where polling had not been completed during the December exercise.
The elections of this period were associated with irregularities involving electoral registers, intimidation of opposition supporters, obstruction of electoral agents and the handling of results.
The federal election crisis intensified disagreements between the country’s major political organisations and raised serious questions about the administration of parliamentary elections.
The 1965 Western Region Election: Violence and Political Breakdown
The Western Region had experienced political instability before the disputed federal election.
The division within the Action Group in 1962 had produced a confrontation between Obafemi Awolowo and Samuel Ladoke Akintola over the party’s leadership and control of the regional government.
The Federal Government declared a state of emergency in the region during the crisis.
Akintola subsequently returned to office and established the Nigerian National Democratic Party, which became an important ally of the NPC.
The regional election held in October 1965 took place against this background of unresolved political rivalry.
The election was marked by reports of multiple voting, ballot box stuffing, intimidation and interference with the electoral process.
The declared results favoured Akintola’s NNDP, but opposition supporters rejected the outcome.
Chief Dauda Adegbenro, a leading Action Group figure, challenged the official results and announced the formation of an alternative government.
He and other opposition leaders were subsequently detained.
Political violence intensified across parts of the Western Region.
Attacks on political opponents, arson, looting and the destruction of property accompanied the breakdown of public order.
READ MORE: Ancient & Pre-Colonial Nigeria
The violence became widely associated with the expression Operation Wetie, referring particularly to attacks involving the burning of people or property.
The disputed election was not the only source of discontent.
The Western Region’s political divisions, disputes over regional authority and economic grievances, including dissatisfaction surrounding cocoa prices, contributed to the wider crisis.
The violence continued during the final months of 1965, adding to the instability confronting Nigeria’s civilian government.
January 1966: The End of Nigeria’s First Republic
On 15 January 1966, Nigerian military officers launched a coup against the country’s civilian political leadership.
Prime Minister Abubakar Tafawa Balewa, Northern Premier Sir Ahmadu Bello and Western Premier Chief Samuel Ladoke Akintola were among the political leaders killed during the coup.
The military intervention brought the First Republic to an end.
Major General Johnson Aguiyi-Ironsi subsequently emerged as Nigeria’s military Head of State.
The coup occurred after several years of political confrontation involving census disputes, disagreements within the governing coalition, rival claims to regional authority, controversial elections and political violence.
The disputed federal election of 1964 and the Western regional election of 1965 formed important parts of the political circumstances preceding the military takeover.
However, the census controversies and electoral disputes were not the only developments involved in the collapse of civilian government.
The military intervention was itself a distinct political and constitutional rupture, involving decisions taken by officers within the armed forces.
The end of the First Republic therefore emerged from a wider sequence of political crises rather than a single disagreement over population figures or the outcome of one election.
Conclusion: How Census Disputes and Electoral Crises Shaped the First Republic
Nigeria’s First Republic experienced a series of interconnected political and constitutional crises between independence in 1960 and the military takeover of January 1966.
The cancellation of the 1962 census and the disputed acceptance of the 1963 figures demonstrated how disagreements over demographic information could become connected to parliamentary representation and the distribution of public resources.
The controversial federal election of 1964 exposed additional problems involving candidate nominations, electoral administration and the formation of government.
The Western Region election of 1965 intensified political divisions and was followed by widespread violence.
Together, these developments contributed to the political instability that preceded the collapse of Nigeria’s first post-independence parliamentary government.
The history of the period illustrates the complex relationship between population statistics, political representation, electoral procedures and the institutions responsible for resolving disputes over public authority.
Author’s Note
The collapse of Nigeria’s First Republic remains an important chapter in the country’s constitutional history. The census controversies of 1962 and 1963 demonstrated how population figures could become central to struggles over political representation and public resources, while the disputed elections of 1964 and 1965 revealed the consequences of unresolved disagreements over electoral administration and political authority. These events show that democratic government depends not only on elections and constitutional arrangements, but also on institutions capable of producing reliable public information, administering political competition and resolving disputes peacefully. Understanding the First Republic requires recognising how several interconnected crises developed over time and how their combined effects shaped the circumstances preceding Nigeria’s first military government.
References
National Population Commission, Nigeria. Census Enumeration: Post-Independent Nigeria Censuses. Official historical account of Nigeria’s population censuses, including the disputed exercises of 1962 and 1963.
Serra, Gerardo, and Morten Jerven (2021). Contested Numbers: Census Controversies and the Press in 1960s Nigeria. The Journal of African History, 62(2), 235–253. Cambridge University Press.
Supreme Court of Nigeria (1964). Attorney-General, Eastern Nigeria v Attorney-General of the Federation. SC 231/1964 and SC 232/1964. Judgment delivered 29 June 1964.
United States Department of State, Office of the Historian (1999). Memorandum from Samuel E. Belk to McGeorge Bundy, 30 December 1964. Foreign Relations of the United States, 1964–1968, Volume XXIV, Africa, Document 358.
Suberu, Rotimi T. (2021). Nigeria in Search of a Credible Electoral Administration: Recent Reforms and Persistent Challenges. In Democracy, Elections, and Constitutionalism in Africa, edited by Charles M. Fombad and Nico Steytler, pp. 331–360. Oxford University Press.
Falola, Toyin, and Matthew M. Heaton (2008). A History of Nigeria. Cambridge University Press.
