March 1967 was one of the most fragile months in Nigeria’s history. The country stood at a crossroads, its leaders struggling to keep the federation from collapsing after the dark turbulence of 1966. Hope still flickered in the air, hope that the words agreed upon in Ghana’s peaceful hills at Aburi could be turned into a foundation for unity at home.
In Lagos, the Supreme Military Council gathered in a solemn session. The officers sat around long tables under the watchful portraits of past leaders, while the cameras rolled for the newsreels. Lieutenant Colonel Yakubu Gowon, the young Head of State, opened the discussions. He wanted the promises made at the Aburi meeting of 4–5 January 1967 to be given legal form. Those meetings had pledged that all regions would share power, that decisions would be made together, and that force would never again be used to settle Nigeria’s differences.
EXPLORE NOW: Democratic Nigeria
The Birth of Decree No. 8
But translating hope into law is never simple. In mid-March, the Federal Government drafted the Constitution (Suspension and Modification) Decree 1967, known as Decree No. 8. To Gowon’s government, it was a safeguard, a way to preserve national unity while giving regions a fair voice. To the Eastern Region, led by Lieutenant Colonel Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu, it was a betrayal.
At the heart of the dispute lay one question: who could wield emergency powers? The decree allowed the Supreme Military Council to act decisively during a national crisis, even without unanimous agreement. The Eastern leaders believed this undermined the spirit of Aburi. They argued that if Lagos could declare an emergency and send troops into any region, then the promise of mutual respect was already broken.
When Hope Turned to Fear
As the weeks passed, the tone of the discussions hardened. Each side read the same clauses but saw opposite meanings. The federal drafters saw stability; the Eastern Region saw domination. Behind these legal arguments stood the shadow of the killings of 1966, when thousands of Easterners had fled northern towns in fear. For Ojukwu, the lesson of that year was clear: without firm constitutional guarantees, the people of his region would never again be safe.
Meanwhile, ordinary Nigerians waited anxiously. Newspapers carried headlines about new decrees, council meetings, and the hope for a peaceful resolution. Yet beneath the surface, suspicion grew. Radio broadcasts from both sides appealed to reason, even as they hinted at distrust. Families in Enugu, Kaduna, and Lagos whispered the same question: would there be war?
The Creation of Twelve States
In late May, Gowon took a step that changed everything. On 27 May 1967, the Federal Military Government announced the creation of twelve new states, replacing the old four regions. It was meant to answer long-standing demands from minorities who felt marginalised within the big regional blocs. But in Enugu, the move was seen as a direct challenge, a deliberate attempt to divide the East and weaken its autonomy.
Just three days later, on 30 May 1967, Ojukwu proclaimed the Republic of Biafra. The declaration echoed through the world: “Having mandated me to proclaim on your behalf, and in your name, that Eastern Nigeria be henceforth a sovereign and independent state, known as the Republic of Biafra.” For many, it was a cry for survival; for others, the beginning of a national tragedy.
From Words to War
Within weeks, the fragile peace collapsed. Federal troops moved to reclaim the seceded region. What had begun as a disagreement over words, over how to interpret Aburi, had become the bloodiest conflict in Nigeria’s modern history.
Looking back, March 1967 feels like the final turning point before the fall. In those council rooms in Lagos, men argued over decrees and constitutional clauses, but behind every sentence lay fear, pride, and memory. Aburi had offered a vision of equality and dialogue. Decree No. 8 sought to codify that vision, yet in doing so, it revealed how deeply divided the country had become.
READ MORE: Ancient & Pre-Colonial Nigeria
Lessons from the Brink
For the ordinary Nigerian reading the morning papers that month, the mood was uncertain but not hopeless. The nation had survived the coups of 1966; perhaps it could survive this too. But by the end of May, it was clear that unity could not be written by decree alone.
March 1967 remains one of Nigeria’s most important lessons, that the balance between unity and autonomy, law and trust, cannot be maintained by paper alone. It must be nurtured by understanding and fairness, or it will crumble, as it did on the eve of war.
Author’s Note
This story revisits Nigeria’s critical moment in 1967, when dialogue and disagreement shaped the nation’s destiny. It reminds us that unity means little without trust and that the promises of peace must be honoured before history repeats itself.
References
Biafra: The Aburi Accord, Official Minutes, Ghana, 4–5 January 1967.
Nigeria’s Supreme Military Council Meets During the National Crisis, British Pathé Newsreel, March 1967.
Constitution (Suspension and Modification) Decree 1967, Federal Military Government Gazette.
States (Creation and Transitional Provisions) Decree No. 14 of 1967, Official Gazette, 27 May 1967.
Proclamation of the Republic of Biafra, Government Printer, Enugu, 30 May 1967.
