The Maitatsine uprisings led by Muhammadu Marwa, widely known as Maitatsine, stand as one of the most violent episodes in Nigeria’s post‑independence history. The unrest that unfolded in Kano in December 1980 and spread to other parts of Northern Nigeria in the early 1980s marked a critical moment in the interaction between religious movements, socio‑economic conditions and the Nigerian state. This article presents a rigorous, historically verified account of the Maitatsine phenomenon, explaining its origins, events, causes and aftermath, in terms that help readers understand the enduring significance of these events for Nigeria.
EXPLORE NOW: Biographies & Cultural Icons of Nigeria
Origins of the Movement
Muhammadu Marwa was a Cameroonian‑born Islamic preacher who migrated to Kano, Northern Nigeria, in about 1945. He became known for his unconventional teachings and his strong criticisms of both established Muslim authorities and secular state institutions. The Hausa nickname Maitatsine means “the one who curses,” reflecting his frequent denunciations of people and authorities he considered corrupt or misguided.
Marwa’s teachings attracted a devoted following in Kano and other urban centres. His followers became known as the Yan Tatsine, which translates as “followers of Maitatsine.” The reasons for their appeal included the economic hardship and social marginalisation experienced by many in Northern Nigerian cities, especially among urban poor, migrants and young men struggling for work and opportunity.
Although his teachings were controversial, Maitatsine positioned himself as a religious reformer condemning what he viewed as moral decay, socio‑economic inequality and corruption among both political and religious elites.
Doctrine and Beliefs
The doctrinal positions of Maitatsine and the Yan Tatsine were distinct from mainstream Sunni Islam. They rejected many aspects of Islamic scholarship upheld by established religious authorities, emphasised literal readings of the Qur’an, and criticised objects and technologies such as radios, watches, bicycles and cars, associating them with Western influence and moral decay.
Significantly, Maitatsine’s teachings also displayed hostility to traditional Muslim scholars and institutions, accusing them of abandoning authentic faith. Followers of the movement lived in communal settings and adopted strict codes of conduct based on Maitatsine’s interpretations.
The 1980 Kano Uprising
On 18 December 1980, a confrontation between Nigerian security forces and believers of Maitatsine in Kano erupted into widespread violence. The immediate trigger involved clashes during an attempt by police to arrest some of Maitatsine’s followers for preaching without permit and for public disorder. What began as a police action escalated into a large‑scale conflict.
The violence in Kano continued for approximately 10 to 11 days, engulfing residential areas and compelling the Nigerian Army to join police efforts to suppress the uprising. Mortuary records and official estimates indicate that around 4,000 to 4,500 people died, including civilians, policemen, soldiers and sect members. Maitatsine himself was fatally wounded during the clashes and died in the course of the conflict.
The uprising revealed the state’s limited preparedness for handling violent urban insurrection and underscored underlying socio‑economic and religious tensions. Entire neighbourhoods were disrupted, and the state’s authority was challenged on multiple fronts.
Spread of Violence in the Early 1980s
The death of Maitatsine did not bring immediate collapse to the movement. In the early 1980s, episodes of violent unrest associated with Yan Tatsine adherents occurred in other parts of Northern Nigeria, including:
- 1982 riots near Maiduguri and in Kaduna, where many adherents had relocated after the Kano incident. These clashes resulted in thousands of deaths and extensive property loss.
- 1984 unrest in Yola, in which Yan Tatsine elements led violent confrontations, leaving many dead and large numbers homeless.
- 1985 fighting in Gombe State, which continued the pattern of confrontation between sect adherents and security forces.
During this period, Musa Makaniki, a close disciple of Maitatsine, emerged as one of the prominent leaders of surviving Yan Tatsine networks. He later became a central figure in continued post‑1980 unrest, eventually being arrested in Nigeria after years in exile.
Causes of the Uprisings
The Maitatsine uprisings were not simply spontaneous religious violence; they were rooted in broader social, economic and political conditions that made certain populations particularly receptive to Maitatsine’s message. Scholars highlight the following contributing factors:
- Economic marginalisation, especially among urban poor and youth, who struggled with unemployment and limited prospects.
- Rapid urbanisation and social dislocation in cities such as Kano, which created communities detached from traditional social supports.
- Weak state capacity to engage with informal religious movements, resulting in confrontations rather than dialogue.
These conditions provided fertile ground for movements that offered both identity and community, particularly among groups that felt left behind by mainstream religious institutions and state structures.
Aftermath and State Response
Following the initial unrest in Kano, the Nigerian government sought to suppress remaining Yan Tatsine enclaves, deploying military and police forces in affected areas. The intensity of the violence and the fatalities recorded triggered official inquiries and a hardening of security responses to similar religious movements.
Although Yan Tatsine violence subsided after 1985, its political and social legacy remained. Nigerian authorities became more vigilant about radical religious groups, and the state’s approach to handling urban religious unrest was shaped by the lessons of the early 1980s.
Legacy and Contemporary Relevance
The Maitatsine uprisings are historically significant because they represent one of the first major episodes in Nigeria where religious radicalism, social marginalisation and state authority collided violently. The events in Kano and subsequent cities highlighted the potential for religious movements to gain traction among disaffected populations and escalate into large‑scale conflict with the state.
In subsequent decades, analysts of Nigerian security and religious movements often refer back to the Maitatsine phenomenon when seeking to understand patterns of radicalisation, urban unrest and the state’s challenge in balancing religious freedom with public safety.
The story of Maitatsine and the Yan Tatsine uprisings is a stark reminder of how religion, socio‑economic hardship and political authority can intersect with destructive consequences. It illustrates the consequences of exclusion and marginalisation, the volatility of urban centres under stress, and the dangers posed by movements that reject established authority and engage in violent confrontation with the state.
READ MORE: Ancient & Pre-Colonial Nigeria
Author’s Note
This article gives readers a clear account of the Maitatsine movement and the Yan Tatsine uprisings in Nigeria. It explains why these events were historically significant, what caused them, and how they shaped later discussions about religion, governance and security in the country.
References
• Mervyn Hiskett, The Maitatsine Riots in Kano, 1980: An Assessment
• Abimbola Adesoji, Islamic Fundamentalism and the Response of the Nigerian State
• Cambridge Core, Islamic Protest under Semi‑Industrial Capitalism: ‘Yan Tatsine Explained
