The war did not always arrive with gunfire. In many Biafran towns, it came first as a voice. It slipped through static and weak batteries into kitchens, bunkers, refugee shelters, and roadside checkpoints. People stopped what they were doing to listen. Food was scarce. Air raids were common. Territory was shrinking. Yet the voice that emerged from Radio Biafra sounded steady, assured, and unbroken. For civilians and soldiers alike, it became a daily signal that collapse had not yet arrived. The voice belonged to Okokon Ndem.
During the Nigerian Civil War from 1967 to 1970, survival depended not only on weapons or supplies but on morale. Radio Biafra became one of the most powerful tools available to the secessionist state, and Okokon Ndem its most recognisable presence. His broadcasts shaped how the war was understood, endured, and remembered by those living inside it.
EXPLORE NOW: Biographies & Cultural Icons of Nigeria
A Broadcaster at the Centre of a War
Okokon Ndem’s prominence was unusual. He was not Igbo. He came from Ikoneto in present day Cross River State. Yet within Biafra, political loyalty outweighed ethnic origin. What mattered was commitment to the cause and the ability to sustain belief under siege.
Ndem was not a military commander. He did not issue orders or plan campaigns. His power lay in interpretation. His broadcasts were polished, theatrical, and relentless. They did not merely relay events but framed them. The war was presented as a fight for survival, not secession for its own sake. This framing resonated deeply with listeners experiencing blockade, displacement, and starvation.
Radio as Psychological Warfare
Radio Biafra was never a neutral platform. It functioned as a weapon of psychological warfare. Ndem’s broadcasts blended verified information with exaggeration and deliberate fabrication, employing what historians describe as white, grey, and black propaganda. Accuracy was secondary to effect.
Biafra lacked the industrial and military resources of the Nigerian state. Radio compensated for that imbalance. Sustained morale could delay despair. Confidence could outlast material shortages. In this sense, broadcasting became a force multiplier.
One of Ndem’s most effective techniques was consistency. Listeners came to associate his tone with certainty. Through repetition and controlled pacing, he projected inevitability. Biafra’s cause was framed as morally justified and historically forced upon its people. For civilians living amid chaos, this narrative imposed order and meaning.
The Language of Siege
A single Igbo phrase became central to his broadcasts:
“Onye ndi iro gbara gburugburu na eche ndu ya nche mgbe niile.”
Translated as, “Whoever is surrounded by enemies guards his life at all times.”
Repeated relentlessly, the phrase reinforced a siege mentality. Vigilance was portrayed not as fear but as wisdom. Over time, the words embedded themselves into daily consciousness, shaping how communities interpreted danger and endurance.
Manufactured Victories and Imagined Weapons
As Biafran forces lost ground, Radio Biafra increasingly departed from verifiable reality. Military setbacks were countered with reports of decisive victories. Entire Nigerian units were declared destroyed when they were not. One widely noted claim involved the annihilation of the Nigerian Army’s Second Division at Abagana.
Ndem also spoke of “Ogbunigwe” as a weapon of overwhelming destructive power, at times implying nuclear capability. While Biafra did develop locally manufactured explosives under that name, no nuclear weapon existed. The broadcasts aimed not to inform but to reassure. Belief mattered more than proof.
Speaking to the Enemy
Radio Biafra was not addressed solely to Biafrans. Nigerian federal troops listened as well. Ndem directly taunted them, exaggerating Biafran strength and questioning federal resolve. His tone was mocking and confrontational.
Federal forces nicknamed him “Lord Haw-Haw,” referencing the British wartime propagandist. The comparison reflected his effectiveness. His goal was to unsettle, intimidate, and erode confidence from within.
Broadcasting Without Territory
When Enugu, Biafra’s capital, fell to federal forces, Radio Biafra did not fall silent. Ndem continued broadcasting as though the state remained intact. In reality, the station had become mobile, at times transmitting from the back of a Land Rover.
To listeners, however, continuity remained intact. The steady voice suggested control even as territory vanished. Sound filled the gap left by physical loss.
A High Value Target
By the later stages of the war, Okokon Ndem was regarded by Nigerian authorities as one of Biafra’s most dangerous figures, second only to Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu. His importance lay not in military command but in his control of perception. He demonstrated that morale could be sustained even in defeat.
After the War
In January 1970, General Yakubu Gowon declared “No Victor, No Vanquished.” Some commentators have suggested that Radio Biafra’s ability to project resilience until the end shaped how the war’s conclusion was publicly framed. While no direct causal link can be established, the perception of Biafra as unbroken until its final surrender influenced how victory was narrated.
Okokon Ndem died in 2003. He remains a contested figure. To some, he symbolises resistance and endurance. To others, manipulation and deception. What is beyond dispute is his impact. He demonstrated that in modern warfare, control of narrative can rival control of territory.
When the radios finally fell silent, the fighting ended. Yet the memory of that voice endured. It reshaped how a war was lived, how defeat was delayed in the mind, and how survival was narrated in real time.
EXPLORE: Nigerian Civil War
AUTHOR’S NOTE
This article examines how Radio Biafra, through the broadcasts of Okokon Ndem, transformed radio into a strategic weapon during the Nigerian Civil War. It highlights the role of psychological warfare, morale, and narrative control in sustaining civilian endurance and military resistance under extreme conditions, showing how sound reshaped the experience of war even as defeat approached.
REFERENCES
- John de St. Jorre, The Nigerian Civil War
- Chinua Achebe, There Was a Country
- Max Siollun, Oil, Politics and Violence
