Some colonial era company names sound like they were designed to explain themselves. The London and Kano Trading Company is one of them. It joins a British financial centre with one of West Africa’s most established commercial cities, signalling a firm created to move goods, money, and influence between inland markets and the Atlantic economy.
In the early twentieth century, Kano was not a remote outpost waiting for trade. It was already a major hub of exchange, with long standing merchant networks, craft production, and regional markets. Colonial firms entered this environment with ambition, but also with the need to adapt to existing systems while reshaping them through regulation and access to imperial routes.
EXPLORE NOW: Biographies & Cultural Icons of Nigeria
Kano, profit on paper, and one failed experiment
In the colonial report for Northern Nigeria covering 1906 to 1907, the Resident in Kano briefly assessed the firm’s position. The London and Kano Trading Company was described as doing a good trade. In the same sentence, the report added a revealing detail, the company’s ostrich farm proved a failure.
This contrast captures the nature of colonial commerce. Profit and loss often coexisted within the same enterprise. While trade in established goods could succeed, experimental ventures promoted as modern or innovative did not always survive local conditions. The failed ostrich scheme stands as an example of how economic optimism could collide with reality.
Gum, tribute, and the mechanics of colonial trade
One of the most telling details in the report concerns gum in the Katsena district. The administration recorded a considerable quantity of gum and explained that arrangements were being made so that tribute paid in kind would be valued and purchased by the London and Kano Trading Company.
This system shows how colonial trade operated beyond simple buying and selling. Tribute was a political obligation. Valuation turned that obligation into a monetary figure. Purchase by a trading firm transformed it into a commodity stream. Commerce, taxation, and governance became tightly interwoven, with companies acting as key intermediaries.
Roads, convoys, and a rule that traders challenged
Movement was central to trade, and movement was controlled. The same report noted the company’s intention to extend business to Hadeija, Katsena, and Gummel. It also recorded a complaint from the firm’s representative about a regulation requiring a European to be placed in charge of any convoy carrying merchandise between those towns.
The rule was described as a hardship that slowed trade. Arab traders, classified administratively as non natives, were exempt from the requirement. After considering the complaint, the administration cancelled the order for the entire Protectorate.
This decision reveals how trade policy evolved through pressure and negotiation. Regulations could be revised when they interfered with commercial efficiency, and exemptions exposed how colonial classifications shaped who could move goods with fewer restrictions.
Kano before and during colonial trade
Colonial firms did not create Kano’s commercial life. They entered a city with deep market traditions and adapted to its rhythms. The report’s references to routes, parcel post, and shifting transport patterns reflect an economy already active and seeking efficient paths to the coast.
Competition existed between European firms and established merchant networks, and colonial trade expanded by working through existing structures rather than replacing them outright.
Marina and Lagos, the coastal hinge
Although the company’s core operations lay in the North, the coast remained essential. Lagos served as the primary port and administrative centre, linking inland trade to shipping, finance, and export documentation. Along Marina, the commercial waterfront, clerks, shipping agents, and warehouses formed the outward facing edge of the colonial economy.
Marina represents the meeting point of inland production and overseas exchange. It was where goods became paperwork, and paperwork became profit.
Missions and limits in Northern Nigeria
Trade was not the only force shaped by colonial policy. Religion and education followed a different path in Northern Nigeria than in the South. Missionary expansion was limited under indirect rule, particularly within Muslim emirates. Administrative caution and political priorities shaped where missions could operate and how institutions developed.
This uneven pattern had long term consequences. Areas with fewer missions experienced different educational trajectories, reinforcing regional contrasts that extended well beyond the colonial period.
READ MORE: Ancient & Pre-Colonial Nigeria
What this company’s story reveals
The London and Kano Trading Company offers more than a business history. Its story illustrates how empire organised trade through regulation, how tribute became commodity supply, how transport rules shaped profit, and how institutions grew unevenly across regions.
Kano’s markets endured, but the routes, valuations, and administrative frameworks around them were increasingly tied to imperial systems. The company’s successes and failures, its complaints and expansions, reflect a colonial economy built on negotiation as much as control.
Author’s Note
This story follows one company to illuminate a larger pattern, how colonial trade in Northern Nigeria blended profit with policy, failure with ambition, and commerce with governance, while broader limits on missionary expansion reveal how deeply administrative choices shaped everyday life and long term development.
References
Colonial Office, Annual Report of the Colonies, Northern Nigeria, Report for 1906 to 1907, presented to both Houses of Parliament by command of His Majesty, December 1907.
Okoye, D, Historical Missionary Activity, Schooling, and the Reversal of Fortunes, Evidence from Nigeria, MPRA Paper, 2014.
Barnes, Andrew E, The Great Prohibition, The Expansion of Christianity in Colonial Northern Nigeria, History Compass, 2010.
