On 30 May 1967, Colonel Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu, Military Governor of Nigeria’s Eastern Region, declared the region independent as the Republic of Biafra. The declaration followed months of ethnic violence and political instability after the 1966 military coups and the anti-Igbo pogroms in the Northern Region.
The Federal Military Government, led by General Yakubu Gowon, rejected secession and launched a military campaign to restore national unity. By late 1967, the federal forces imposed a land, sea and air blockade on Biafra, aiming to cut off its military supplies. Over time, the blockade also severed access to food, medicine and other essentials for civilians.
Initially, some smuggling and limited relief operations continued through neighbouring territories, but by mid-1968 the blockade had become almost total. Crops were destroyed, transport routes collapsed and millions were displaced. Local communities survived on wild roots, cassava leaves and palm kernels. A humanitarian catastrophe unfolded.
EXPLORE: Nigerian Civil War
Starvation and the Scale of the Famine
By mid-1968, famine and disease were rampant. Humanitarian workers and journalists described scenes of mass starvation across Biafra. The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and medical teams reported that hospitals and makeshift clinics were overwhelmed by malnourished civilians, particularly children.
Although casualty estimates vary, most historians place the total wartime death toll between one and two million, combining military losses with those from starvation and preventable disease. The highest concentration of civilian deaths occurred between late 1968 and mid-1969, when the blockade reached its peak and access routes were almost entirely sealed.
Contemporary claims that “hundreds of thousands were dying each day” were propaganda exaggerations used to mobilise global sympathy. Verified humanitarian records instead indicate thousands of deaths daily in the worst-hit localities, not nationwide. Even so, the mortality rate was catastrophic by any measure.
Kwashiorkor and the Face of Suffering in Biafra
The most haunting symbol of the Biafran crisis was the image of the malnourished child with a swollen belly, skeletal limbs and rust-coloured hair, the hallmarks of kwashiorkor, a severe form of protein-energy malnutrition.
Field reports from ICRC and Caritas clinics in towns such as Uli, Udi, Owerri and Orlu described treating thousands of patients weekly for acute malnutrition, anaemia and vitamin deficiencies.
One major relief centre near Udi, serving an estimated 150,000 people in early 1969, treated about 8,000 patients per week and provided protein supplements, milk powder, soya blends and groundnut mixtures, to roughly 100,000 individuals.
These figures demonstrate the enormous local caseloads and the limitations of humanitarian capacity under siege conditions. The International Review of the Red Cross (October 1968) identified kwashiorkor as the single most visible medical crisis of the war. Photographs of afflicted children circulated globally, transforming “Biafra” into a synonym for modern famine.
Relief Efforts and the Airlift of the war in Biafra
The worsening famine spurred one of the largest humanitarian airlifts of the twentieth century. Neutral and faith-based organisations sought to deliver relief despite the Nigerian government’s embargo and concerns over sovereignty.
The International Committee of the Red Cross began organised flights in 1968 from Fernando Po and later from São Tomé. However, Nigerian authorities regarded these as illegal incursions, and several aircraft were fired upon. After an ICRC plane was shot down in June 1969, killing its crew, the organisation suspended most of its operations.
In response, Joint Church Aid (JCA), a coalition of Catholic and Protestant agencies, assumed the task. From late 1968 to early 1970, JCA conducted thousands of night-time “mercy flights” from São Tomé and Gabon to the airstrip at Uli, evading radar and anti-aircraft fire.
Estimates from the JCA archives suggest that between 50,000 and 60,000 tonnes of food and medicine were delivered during the operation.
Despite this heroic effort, the blockade and the vast scale of need meant that aid supplies never matched demand. Distribution networks were limited, storage facilities scarce, and some areas remained unreachable. Even at its height, the airlift could feed only a small fraction of Biafra’s estimated 10–14 million inhabitants.
READ MORE: Ancient & Pre-Colonial Nigeria
Propaganda, Perception and Media Influence
The Biafran war unfolded in an age of expanding global television coverage. Images of starving children circulated across Europe and North America, provoking outrage and humanitarian mobilisation. Yet both combatants also used the media strategically.
The Biafran government publicised famine images to win sympathy and secure diplomatic recognition, while the Nigerian side emphasised unity and the illegitimacy of secession.
Scholars such as Heerten and Moses (2014) have shown how the conflict became a “media-humanitarian moment”, reshaping Western perceptions of African crises.
Although some wartime statements exaggerated the scale of daily mortality, the verified humanitarian record still demonstrates a catastrophe of immense magnitude. Recognising the difference between advocacy and evidence helps maintain historical clarity without diminishing the suffering that occurred.
Aftermath and Humanitarian Legacy of the war in Biafra
Biafra capitulated on 12 January 1970, bringing nearly three years of conflict to an end. The immediate post-war years were marked by reconstruction and reintegration policies under the Federal Government’s “No victor, no vanquished” declaration.
However, the scars of the famine endured. Thousands of children who survived severe malnutrition suffered from stunted growth, weakened immunity and long-term cognitive effects. Agricultural production had collapsed, infrastructure lay in ruins and entire communities were traumatised.
The crisis profoundly shaped the ethics and methods of international humanitarianism.
Doctors who had worked in Biafra, frustrated by restrictions on speaking publicly about atrocities, went on to found Médecins Sans Frontières (Doctors Without Borders) in 1971. The organisation’s principle of témoignage, bearing witness to suffering, was directly inspired by their experiences in Nigeria.
Biafra thus became a turning point, highlighting the moral dilemmas of neutrality, state sovereignty and the right to intervene in humanitarian emergencies.
Author,s Note
The humanitarian catastrophe in Biafra remains one of the most tragic chapters in Nigeria’s modern history. The convergence of political conflict, blockade and famine revealed how modern warfare could devastate civilian populations on a massive scale.
While wartime propaganda exaggerated some figures, the verified evidence indicates that between one and two million people, mostly civilians, died from hunger and disease. The photographs of kwashiorkor-stricken children not only shocked the world but also helped redefine humanitarian action for decades to come.
Biafra’s tragedy stands as both a warning and a lesson: that in modern conflicts, starvation can become a weapon of war, and that the world’s moral responsibility to protect civilians must never be constrained by politics.
References:
International Committee of the Red Cross. International Review of the Red Cross, No. 91 (Oct. 1968): “Help to War Victims in Nigeria.”
John de St. Jorre (1972). The Nigerian Civil War. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Suzanne Cronje (1972). The World and Nigeria: The Diplomatic History of the Biafran War. London: Sidgwick & Jackson.
Joint Church Aid Archives (1970). Operational Reports on the Biafran Airlift. Geneva.
Heerten, L. & Moses, D. (2014). “The Nigeria–Biafra War: Postcolonial Conflict and the Question of Genocide.” Humanity Journal, 5(3): 345–371.
Uche, L. (2008). Mass Media, People and Politics in Nigeria. Concept Publications.
