Before British colonisation, land in present-day Nigeria was not viewed as a saleable commodity but as a sacred heritage linking the living to their ancestors. Among the Yoruba, land belonged to families and was administered by community heads for the collective benefit. The Igbo regarded it as an ancestral gift that sustained life and lineage. In Northern Nigeria, Islamic principles of stewardship guided access and cultivation under communal frameworks.
EXPLORE NOW: Biographies & Cultural Icons of Nigeria
These customary systems were flexible and socially rooted. Ownership was collective and transferable only through kinship, not purchase. Land symbolised belonging and identity. This harmony began to erode in the late nineteenth century as British commercial and administrative interests expanded. The colonial state replaced communal custodianship with legal ownership, interpreting land through capitalist and imperial lenses.
Early Colonial Intrusions: Treaties and Commercial Claims (1861–1900)
British involvement accelerated after the 1861 annexation of Lagos via the Treaty of Cession signed by Oba Dosunmu, which brought Lagos under Crown authority and opened the way for British property and municipal law on the island. In the Lower Niger and Delta, the Royal Niger Company used hundreds of commercial “treaties” with chiefs during the 1880s and 1890s that the company and later British officials interpreted as exclusivity and control arrangements. When the company’s charter ended in 1900, its territories were absorbed into the Crown’s protectorates.
These instruments were often signed under unequal circumstances and later read as territorial claims, enabling the colonial state to legitimise occupation and provide legal cover for resource extraction and commercial land transfers. What began as commercial diplomacy evolved into state-sanctioned dispossession under the guise of legal agreements.
The Northern Protectorate and the Rise of State Ownership (1908–1916)
Under Sir Frederick Lugard, the colonial administration progressively introduced proclamations and ordinances to assert state control over land in the North. Legislation affecting native land rights evolved between about 1908 and 1916, culminating in the Land and Native Rights Ordinance of the mid-1910s, which consolidated government authority in the Protectorate.
These instruments did not uniformly abolish customary access; rather, they reframed occupancy as a statutory right held under government supervision, with final disposal powers reserved for colonial authorities. Lugard and his administrators defended this framework as a means of protecting communities from settler expropriation and enabling coordinated infrastructure and revenue projects. In practice, however, it granted the colonial state sweeping powers to allocate land for railways, military posts, and plantations, thereby reducing many peasants to tenants at the administration’s discretion.
This policy entrenched state landlordism, a system that redefined indigenous communities as mere occupants on government property.
Southern Nigeria: From Custom to Commodification (1900s–1916)
In areas where European commerce and urban growth were strongest, colonial law created statutory pathways for acquiring land. Early Public Lands and acquisition ordinances introduced in the first two decades of the twentieth century and consolidated through later amendments empowered the colonial government to take land for “public purposes.” Although the ordinances sometimes acknowledged indigenous tenure, in practice, courts and registration systems privileged written title and deeds, eroding oral customary claims.
Urban expansion in Lagos, Calabar, and other coastal towns led to dispossession and resettlement to make way for European quarters, ports, and administrative facilities. The regime’s legal instruments transformed many customary holdings into alienable assets administered through colonial bureaucracy. This shift from communal heritage to commodified property altered the social meaning of land and the foundations of local governance.
Dual Land Systems and Regional Disparities (1914–1940s)
After the 1914 Amalgamation of the Northern and Southern Protectorates, the British maintained two distinct systems: Crown ownership in the North and a hybrid of statutory and customary tenure in the South. This duality served imperial interests by enabling indirect rule while ensuring ultimate British control.
In the North, all land remained vested in the government; in the South, economic displacement continued under the guise of modernisation. By the 1930s, land disputes multiplied, and colonial courts increasingly privileged statutory law over indigenous customs. This pattern of alienation fuelled early nationalist resistance and exposed the deep inequities of the colonial land order.
Resistance and Reform: Indigenous Voices Against Dispossession
Key colonial figures Frederick Lugard, Hugh Clifford, and Bernard Bourdillon consolidated state control through successive ordinances. Yet resistance grew among Nigerian nationalists. Herbert Macaulay, founder of the Nigerian National Democratic Party (NNDP), was among the earliest critics of land expropriation. His petitions and publications in the 1920s and 1930s condemned colonial land policies for eroding community autonomy and sovereignty.
Land rights soon became a central theme in the nationalist struggle for self-determination, linking economic justice with political freedom. The debate over ownership was not merely about territory but about dignity, authority, and the right to self-governance.
Late Colonial Reforms and the Postcolonial Legacy (1945–1978)
Post-war population growth and accelerating urbanisation increased pressure on land and prompted regional legislative responses. Several regions enacted laws in the 1950s to consolidate state control of public land and to regulate customary transfers, for example, Western Region measures in 1958, such as the Communal Land Rights (Vesting in Trustees) Law that formalised trusteeship and sought to curb arbitrary chiefly sales.
At independence in 1960, the legal patchwork remained; the 1978 Land Use Act attempted to create national uniformity by vesting land in the governors of each state to hold in trust, thereby institutionalising the centralised control that traced back to colonial doctrine. That centralisation resolved some problems, such as standardising certificates of occupancy, but it also entrenched bureaucratic discretion and left customary claimants dependent on statutory recognition.
Contemporary Implications
Colonial land policies did more than alter ownership; they transformed Nigeria’s social fabric. The erosion of communal tenure undermined local governance, deepened inequality, and sowed the seeds of modern land conflict. Contemporary disputes in the Niger Delta, Middle Belt, and rapidly expanding cities echo colonial precedents of dispossession.
The coexistence of customary and statutory systems continues to generate confusion, leaving rural communities without formal recognition of ancestral lands. True reform requires confronting this historical inheritance and restoring land as a shared trust rather than a bureaucratic asset.
British colonial land laws in Nigeria redefined ownership, subordinated indigenous systems, and entrenched state dominance. What began as administrative control evolved into structural dispossession, shaping patterns of inequality that persist today. Understanding this legacy is essential to building a just and inclusive framework for modern land governance.
READ MORE: Ancient & Pre-Colonial Nigeria
Author’s Note
This article examines how British land laws reshaped Nigeria’s indigenous tenure systems and how their legacy continues to influence land disputes, governance, and inequality in the postcolonial era.
References
Falola, Toyin & Heaton, Matthew M. A History of Nigeria. Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Okoth-Ogendo, H. W. O. Tenants of the Crown: Evolution of Property Law in Africa. ACTS Press, 1991.
Lugard, Frederick. The Dual Mandate in British Tropical Africa. Blackwood and Sons, 1922.
