From the early 1900s until the 1930s, corporal punishment, particularly public flogging, was a defining feature of British colonial justice in Northern Nigeria. Though often defended by officials as a “humane” alternative to imprisonment, the practice drew criticism both within Nigeria and internationally. Public floggings became more than local punishments: they turned into scandals that undermined the British colonial administration’s claims of a “civilising mission.”
These events not only exposed the violence underpinning colonial rule but also mobilised missionaries, African newspapers, and nationalist activists, giving anti-colonial movements powerful material to question Britain’s legitimacy.
Colonial Courts and the Legal Basis for Flogging
When Britain established formal rule in Northern Nigeria in 1900, officials under High Commissioner Frederick Lugard expanded the use of corporal punishment within the system of indirect rule. The Native Courts Ordinance of 1900 and subsequent amendments gave colonial and “native” courts authority to sentence offenders to flogging.
Justifications were rooted in racialised assumptions. Colonial administrators argued that imprisonment was inappropriate for “tribal” societies and that Africans “preferred” immediate physical punishment. In reality, flogging served as a tool of deterrence and humiliation, often imposed for relatively minor offences such as tax arrears, petty theft, breaches of labour regulations, or even alleged insolence toward colonial officers.
EXPLORE NOW: Military Era & Coups in Nigeria
Sentences were typically carried out in public spaces such as courthouse squares or markets. Convicts were stripped, tied to stakes or frames, and flogged with canes or whips. While officials insisted such punishments were controlled and regulated, reports from witnesses and missionaries described instances of extreme brutality, lasting scars, and occasional deaths.
Scandals and Controversial Cases
By the 1910s and 1920s, specific cases began to spark widespread outrage.
- Educated clerks punished: One well-documented scandal involved government clerks in the north who were publicly flogged after being accused of misconduct. Missionary and African newspapers argued that the real issue was not their alleged offence but their rising social status and education, which unsettled colonial officials.
- Flogging of women: Cases of women being flogged—often for tax-related offences—caused shock. In many Nigerian societies, corporal punishment of women was rare, and public whippings of women, sometimes including pregnant or elderly women, drew condemnation from missionaries and the press.
- Christian converts: Mission-educated Africans who had embraced Christianity and Western dress were not spared. Their flogging undermined the British claim that colonial rule promoted Christian civilisation.
- Traditional rulers’ families: Relatives of emirs and chiefs, allies of the colonial system, were occasionally subjected to flogging. This created strains in the system of indirect rule and exposed limits to Britain’s “partnership” with African rulers.
These incidents gained notoriety not only in Nigeria but also abroad. Nigerian-owned newspapers such as the Lagos Weekly Record and missionary publications relayed eyewitness reports to Britain, where critics highlighted the contradiction between Britain’s rhetoric of civilisation and the brutality of its colonial justice
Missionary and Press Opposition
Missionaries, initially supportive of colonial rule, became some of the strongest critics of flogging. They reported abuses, especially against Christian converts and women, to their supporters in Europe. Their stance carried moral weight because missionary voices had been central in justifying colonialism as a Christian duty.
READ MORE: Ancient & Pre-Colonial Nigeria
The African press also played a vital role. Papers in Lagos and Southern Nigeria reported extensively on floggings, keeping the scandals alive despite threats of suppression from colonial administrators. These publications transformed individual cases into symbols of systemic injustice, amplifying local grievances into global debates.
By the 1920s, British newspapers such as The Manchester Guardian and The Times occasionally picked up Nigerian stories, fuelling public debates in London and embarrassing the Colonial Office.
Colonial Defence and Attempts at Reform
Faced with mounting criticism, colonial authorities attempted to defend flogging. They argued:
- It was more humane than imprisonment, given prison overcrowding and poor conditions.
- It was consistent with “African traditions”, despite evidence that many Nigerian societies had not practised public corporal punishment in such forms.
- It was limited and regulated by the courts, though records show frequent abuse and uneven enforcement.
Over time, the Colonial Office introduced stricter rules, such as limiting the number of strokes or restricting floggings to younger males. Yet reports of excessive and arbitrary punishments persisted into the 1930s, demonstrating the weakness of oversight.
Impact on Anti-Colonial Politics
The flogging scandals became a rallying point for early nationalist movements. Activists like Herbert Macaulay in Lagos and others across West Africa used flogging cases to argue that colonialism was inherently unjust and could not be reformed.
- Women’s movements: Reports of women being flogged inspired protests, petitions, and tax resistance, particularly during the 1929 Aba Women’s War in Southern Nigeria, though separate in cause, echoed outrage at women’s public humiliation.
- Nationalist rhetoric: The image of educated Africans, Christians, and loyal clerks being publicly whipped undermined Britain’s civilising claims and highlighted racial discrimination.
- Internationalisation: Nigerian activists, aided by missionary and humanitarian groups, learned to publicise colonial abuses abroad, a tactic that would be crucial in later independence struggles.
From Humiliation to Resistance
By the 1930s, flogging remained legal but had become politically toxic. The scandals demonstrated that colonial rule relied not on civilisation but on coercion and humiliation. What colonial officials saw as a tool of control instead fuelled defiance, giving anti-colonial movements a powerful symbol of the degradation of African dignity.
Author’s Note
The Colonial Public Flogging Scandals in Northern Nigeria (1904–1933) revealed the violent contradictions of British rule. Far from being humane or traditional, the flogging system was racially discriminatory, arbitrary, and degrading. Its exposure by missionaries, African newspapers, and international critics transformed humiliation into resistance, giving early nationalist movements both moral force and political ammunition.
Colonialism in Nigeria was sustained not by civilisation but by coercion. The flogging scandals remind us that systems of injustice often collapse not because of their strength but because their brutality becomes impossible to hide.
References
- Crowder, M. The Story of Nigeria. Faber & Faber, 1978.
- Falola, T. Colonialism and Violence in Nigeria. Indiana University Press, 2009.
- Ochonu, M. E. Colonial Meltdown: Northern Nigeria in the Great Depression. Ohio University Press, 2009.
