Nigeria’s post-independence history is marked by a series of military coups that profoundly affected governance, civil liberties, and the rule of law. One of the most notable tools of control during these periods was detention without trial, where individuals often political opponents, activists, or perceived threats were held indefinitely without formal charges. Understanding how military regimes employed this practice illuminates its lasting impact on Nigerian society and the legal system.
Legal Frameworks Under Military Rule
Military regimes often bypassed Nigeria’s constitutional safeguards. While the 1963 and 1979 Constitutions theoretically guaranteed personal liberty, successive military governments suspended constitutional provisions through decrees. The State Security (Detention of Persons) Decree No. 2 of 1984, introduced under the Buhari regime, allowed indefinite detention of individuals suspected of threatening state security. These decrees removed judicial oversight and prevented detainees from accessing legal counsel, effectively placing state power above the law. International human rights organisations, including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, later documented these decrees as violations of fundamental liberties.
EXPLORE NOW: Military Era & Coups in Nigeria
Key Coups and Patterns of Detention
During the first coup in January 1966, led largely by young army officers, Prime Minister Tafawa Balewa and several northern leaders were assassinated. The counter-coup in July 1966 brought General Yakubu Gowon to power, and both coups saw the arbitrary detention of political figures and army officers suspected of disloyalty. These events set a precedent for using detention without trial to consolidate power.
Subsequent coups continued this pattern. The overthrow of General Murtala Muhammed in 1975 and the subsequent military governments, including General Olusegun Obasanjo’s administration, frequently used detention without trial to neutralise opposition. The December 1983 coup, which brought General Muhammadu Buhari to power, reinstated widespread preventive detention under emergency decrees, targeting politicians and perceived opponents of military rule. The August 1985 coup led by General Ibrahim Babangida continued these practices, applying detention without trial to politicians, activists, and journalists critical of the regime. These patterns institutionalised a climate of fear, where dissent or political disagreement could result in indefinite confinement.
Historical Impact on Civil Society
Detention without trial under military regimes had profound long-term consequences. Civil liberties were eroded as citizens experienced a chilling effect on political participation and free expression. Public mistrust grew toward both military authorities and the judicial system. The experience of arbitrary detention under military rule influenced later legal reforms, including the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA 2015), which aimed to prevent prolonged pre-trial detention and restore due process.
International Perspective
Globally, prolonged detention without trial has consistently drawn criticism. The European Court of Human Rights ruled against indefinite detention without judicial oversight, reinforcing the principle that even states acting under security concerns must respect human rights. Nigeria’s military regimes illustrate the dangers when legal safeguards are suspended in favour of executive power.
Lessons for Modern Nigeria
Understanding detention during military coups highlights the importance of judicial independence, legal accountability, and human rights vigilance. Ensuring that courts are not bypassed by executive or military authority, codifying limits on pre-trial detention, and protecting citizens from arbitrary confinement are all essential for strengthening democratic governance and public trust in the justice system.
EXPLORE: Nigerian Civil War
Detention without trial was a defining feature of Nigeria’s military coups, enabling successive regimes to consolidate power, suppress dissent, and bypass the rule of law. While the practice was justified under claims of national security, its historical record reveals deep consequences for civil liberties, governance, and legal institutions. The Nigerian experience underscores the enduring importance of constitutional protections, judicial oversight, and human rights awareness in safeguarding society against arbitrary detention.
Author’s Note
This article highlights how detention without trial functioned as a tool of control during Nigeria’s military coups. Historical records show that constitutional safeguards were suspended, opposition was silenced, and civil liberties were undermined. The key takeaway is that safeguarding personal liberty, judicial oversight, and accountability is essential to prevent the recurrence of arbitrary detention and to strengthen democratic governance in Nigeria.
References
Amnesty International: Nigeria – Human Rights Under Military Rule, 1996.
Human Rights Watch: Arbitrary Detention in Nigeria: State Security Decrees and Military Rule, 1996.
Siollun, Max: Oil, Politics and Violence: Nigeria’s Military Coups 1966–1999, 2009.
