Nigeria’s first military coup in January 1966 led to a cycle of successive military regimes. The coups themselves created an environment of uncertainty and fear among politicians, civil servants, and ordinary citizens. With frequent changes in leadership and purges of suspected rivals within the armed forces, fear became both a tool and a consequence of governance, reinforcing the authority of the ruling military elite.
Mechanisms of Fear in Military Governance
Military governments frequently detained critics, journalists, and opposition figures without trial. Security agencies such as the State Security Service (SSS) and military intelligence units operated with broad powers, monitoring dissent and enforcing compliance. Individuals accused of opposing the government often faced indefinite detention under decrees that bypassed standard judicial procedures, creating widespread caution among the populace.
EXPLORE NOW: Military Era & Coups in Nigeria
Suppression of Political Opposition
Political parties and civil society organisations were systematically restricted or dissolved under military rule. Laws and decrees empowered the regime to ban opposition activities, censor media, and control public discourse. Public demonstrations and strikes were suppressed, often violently, reinforcing the climate of fear.
High-Profile Executions and Punitive Trials
The execution of the Ogoni Nine in 1995 under General Sani Abacha’s regime exemplified the use of fear as a governance tool. Ken Saro‑Wiwa and eight other activists, members of the Movement for the Survival of the Ogoni People, were tried by a military tribunal and executed for protesting environmental degradation in the Niger Delta. International observers condemned the trial as unjust. This event sent a chilling message to activists and opposition groups across the country.
Media Censorship and Information Control
Military regimes in Nigeria controlled public perception through media censorship. Newspapers were closed, journalists were detained, and broadcasts were monitored to prevent criticism of the government. By controlling information, the regimes amplified the perception of state power and deterred public dissent.
EXPLORE: Nigerian Civil War
Effects of Fear on Nigerian Society
The pervasive climate of fear had profound social and political consequences. Civic engagement declined, trust in institutions eroded, and communities fractured under the pressure of surveillance and repression. Individuals prioritised personal safety over collective action, limiting political participation and weakening democratic culture. While fear allowed military rulers to maintain short-term control, it left lasting scars on Nigeria’s political landscape
Author’s Note
Fear was a central instrument of governance during Nigeria’s military regimes. Arbitrary arrests, suppression of opposition, media censorship, and high-profile executions reinforced military authority and deterred dissent. The Ogoni Nine case illustrates how fear extended to civil society, creating a climate where opposition could be deadly. Understanding this period demonstrates how the misuse of state power damages human rights, erodes trust in institutions, and leaves a legacy of caution that can persist long after military rule ends.
References
Execution of Ken Saro‑Wiwa and activists during military rule. Human Rights Watch documentation.
Human Rights Violations Investigation Commission (Oputa Panel) Investigation of abuses under Nigeria’s military governments (1984–1999).
State Security and Repression Amnesty International reports on arbitrary detention and censorship during Nigerian military rule.
