Nigeria was never a single political world. It was a landscape of empires, kingdoms, city states, frontier zones, and decentralised societies, each shaped by its environment, economy, and political traditions. State formation was not a single moment when a king appeared or a capital was founded. It was a gradual process in which authority became durable, institutions took shape, and rulers learned how to organise people, resources, and belief.
Understanding how these states emerged helps explain why some polities expanded into empires while others governed through shared authority and negotiation.
READ MORE: Ancient & Pre-Colonial Nigeria
Many paths to power, not one Nigerian model
Because precolonial societies across the region differed widely, historians emphasise multiple paths to statehood.
Some states grew by controlling trade routes and markets. Others expanded through warfare and military organisation. Some relied on sacred kingship and ritual authority to bind communities together. In many regions, decentralised systems proved more effective, with power shared among lineages, councils, or age grades rather than concentrated in a single throne.
This diversity explains why no single explanation fits every polity.
Evidence from the past, archaeology, memory, and records
Archaeology reveals settlement patterns, craft production, urban growth, and long term change. Written sources, where they exist, offer names, dates, and political detail, though often shaped by court interests or outside perspectives. Oral traditions preserve deep historical memory, recounting origins, conflicts, and values, even as they evolve with performance and political needs.
Environment and agriculture, building the base of authority
One major factor shaping political complexity was ecology.
Where land and farming systems supported large populations and food surpluses, rulers could sustain courts, armies, and specialist classes. Surplus made administration possible and allowed authority to extend over wider territories.
In more challenging environments, authority often remained dispersed. These societies were not weak. They developed political systems suited to negotiation, mobility, and local autonomy rather than centralised rule.
Trade and wealth, the engine of expansion
Trade networks played a decisive role in many states.
Control of markets and routes brought revenue, prestige, and strategic importance. Rulers who taxed trade could fund armies, reward followers, and stabilise dynasties. Long distance commerce also connected states to wider diplomatic worlds.
Kanem Bornu and the trans Saharan world
In the Chad Basin, long distance trade linked local rulers to North Africa and beyond. This commercial position strengthened elite power and supported durable political institutions, even as it exposed the state to rivalry and conflict.
Trade created opportunity, but it also created pressure. Wealth attracted competition, raids, and internal struggles over control.
Warfare and military organisation
Warfare was both a consequence and a cause of state formation.
Sustained conflict encouraged centralised command, organised mobilisation, and stable revenue systems. Over time, military needs pushed rulers to strengthen administration and authority.
Oyo and military advantage
The rise of the Oyo empire is often linked to its military organisation. That same system, however, faced limits as conditions changed. Succession crises, shifting alliances, and logistical strain could weaken even powerful states, showing that political strength was never permanent.
Technology and production
Control over production mattered as much as control over land.
Iron working, craft specialisation, and organised labour supported trade, warfare, and urban life. States that concentrated skilled producers gained economic and military advantages.
Technology did not create states on its own. It mattered because rulers learned how to regulate labour, tax production, and integrate these systems into political authority.
Institutions and legitimacy, making power last
Material strength alone could not sustain rule. Legitimacy was essential.
Sacred kingship, ritual authority, councils, courts, and moral expectations all shaped how power was accepted and constrained. In many kingdoms, rulers governed through negotiation with elites and local authorities rather than pure force.
Centralisation did not always mean despotism, and decentralisation did not mean disorder. Each system reflected local values and conditions.
EXPLORE: Nigerian Civil War
Atlantic era pressures and political change
The expansion of Atlantic commerce reshaped political incentives across the region.
Changing trade patterns encouraged militarisation, new alliances, and new forms of wealth extraction. The transatlantic slave trade intensified competition and violence in some areas while transforming state finances and diplomacy in others.
Its effects were uneven, strengthening some polities while destabilising others.
Why these histories matter
The emergence of precolonial Nigerian states was not the story of inevitable progress or sudden collapse. It was a story of adaptation, negotiation, and resilience. States rose because they learned how to organise land, labour, trade, warfare, and belief into systems that could endure.
Author’s Note
The rise of precolonial Nigerian states was not driven by a single invention, migration, or conquest. Power grew where leaders learned how to balance environment and economy, war and diplomacy, authority and legitimacy. What endures in these histories is not just the scale of empires, but the creativity of political solutions shaped by land, markets, conflict, and belief. These stories remind us that statehood was built slowly, tested constantly, and never guaranteed.
References
Osarhieme B. Osadolor and Leo E. Otoide, “State Formation in Precolonial Nigeria, A Historiographic Assessment,” in Precolonial Nigeria, Essays in Honor of Toyin Falola, edited by Akinwumi Ogundiran, Africa World Press, 2005.
Nonso Obikili, “State Formation in Precolonial Nigeria,” in The Oxford Handbook of Nigerian Politics, Oxford University Press, online edition, 2018.
Toyin Falola and Matthew M. Heaton, A History of Nigeria, Cambridge University Press, 2010.
