Nigeria’s borders, stretching from Lake Chad in the northeast to the Atlantic coast in the southwest, were not drawn by its peoples but by imperial diplomacy conducted far from Africa. Between the 1880s and early 1900s, a network of European treaties, colonial charters, and boundary agreements created what would become modern Nigeria.
Although the Berlin Conference of 1884–85 did not directly map Nigeria’s boundaries, it provided the diplomatic and legal framework that made their creation possible. Under its doctrines, European powers competed for “effective occupation” of African territories, meaning that only actual administrative control could justify a claim. For Britain, this rule encouraged deeper penetration inland from its coastal enclaves along the Niger and Benue Rivers, gradually fusing hundreds of communities into one colonial state.
EXPLORE NOW: Democratic Nigeria
The Berlin Conference: A Framework for Partition
Convened by German Chancellor Otto von Bismarck between November 1884 and February 1885, the Berlin Conference aimed to regulate European expansion in Africa and prevent direct conflict among colonial rivals. Fourteen nations attended, including Britain, France, Germany, Portugal, and Belgium, but no African representatives were invited.
The resulting General Act of Berlin introduced several principles that shaped Africa’s colonial borders:
- Effective occupation,a European claim to territory would only be recognised if the claimant exercised real authority and administration on the ground.
- Freedom of navigationon the Niger and Congo Rivers, ensuring open access for trade.
- Suppression of the slave tradein territories placed under colonial rule.
The conference itself did not draw any African boundaries, but it legitimised a new imperial scramble. European powers now raced to sign treaties with African rulers, hoist flags, and establish trading posts to demonstrate “occupation.” For Britain, this diplomatic arms race meant formalising commercial influence in the Niger basin and transforming trade relationships into territorial claims.
Britain and the Royal Niger Company
Britain’s interest in the Niger region predated the Berlin Conference. The annexation of Lagos in 1861 and the creation of the Oil Rivers Protectorate in the 1880s had already provided a coastal foothold for trade and naval operations.
But after Berlin, Britain moved to secure its inland sphere before France or Germany could challenge it. George Taubman Goldie, a British merchant and strategist, merged competing trading firms along the Niger into the National African Company, later granted a Royal Charter in 1886 and renamed the Royal Niger Company (RNC).
This charter empowered the RNC to make treaties, administer territories, and collect customs duties in the Crown’s name. Between the late 1880s and 1890s, company agents concluded hundreds of “treaties” with local rulers. Most were written in English and signed under conditions of unequal understanding, local chiefs often believed they were agreeing to trade monopolies, not ceding sovereignty.
Nevertheless, these documents provided Britain with the legal pretext for “effective occupation” demanded by the Berlin Act. The Royal Niger Company thus became a quasi-government, exercising authority over vast stretches of the Niger basin with the Crown’s backing but under private control.
Rivalries and Boundary Treaties
European competition for control over what became Nigeria was fierce. France expanded eastward from Dahomey (modern Benin) and northward from the Upper Niger, while Germany advanced inland from Kamerun (Cameroon). To prevent clashes, Britain entered into a series of boundary agreements that defined Nigeria’s emerging outline:
- Anglo-French Convention of 1890:Fixed the border between the French territories of Dahomey and Britain’s Lagos Colony.
- Anglo-German Agreements (1885, 1893, 1896, 1913):Sequential treaties that clarified the boundary between British Nigeria and German Kamerun. The 1913 Convention was especially significant, its demarcations largely survive today as the Nigeria–Cameroon border, reaffirmed by the International Court of Justice in 2002.
- Anglo-French Convention of 14 June 1898:Defined the northern and western frontiers of British influence in West Africa, including areas around the Niger and Lake Chad. Ratifications were exchanged in 1899.
These agreements were drafted in European chancelleries, not African capitals. Boundaries were drawn along rivers, meridians, and parallels of latitude, often splitting ethnic and cultural groups between colonial jurisdictions. What was administratively convenient for Europe proved socially disruptive for Africa.
READ MORE: Ancient & Pre-Colonial Nigeria
From Company Rule to Colonial Protectorates
By the late 1890s, the Royal Niger Company faced mounting challenges. Local resistance, the costs of administration, and international disputes made private rule unsustainable. In 1899, the British government revoked the RNC’s charter.
On 1 January 1900, the Company’s territories were transferred to the Crown, marking the start of direct British colonial administration. Britain reorganised the area into three distinct jurisdictions:
- Protectorate of Northern Nigeria,encompassing the Sokoto Caliphate, Bornu, and other emirates.
- Protectorate of Southern Nigeria, merging the Niger Coast Protectorate with territories of the lower Niger.
- Colony of Lagos,retaining its separate administration until 1906, when it joined Southern Nigeria.
This tripartite system reflected administrative pragmatism rather than cultural unity. In the north, British officials ruled indirectly through emirs and Islamic institutions. In the south, governance was more direct, led by colonial officers and local intermediaries. These contrasting systems would later influence Nigeria’s political and social divides.
The 1914 Amalgamation
By the early 20th century, British officials, most notably Frederick Lugard, argued that managing separate protectorates was inefficient. The north relied on grants-in-aid from London, while the more prosperous south produced a trade surplus. Lugard proposed merging the two administrations to streamline revenue collection, transport, and civil services.
On 1 January 1914, Lugard formally proclaimed the Amalgamation of the Northern and Southern Protectorates into the Colony and Protectorate of Nigeria. The name “Nigeria,” already popularised by journalist Flora Shaw in The Times (8 January 1897), was derived from the Niger River.
Although presented as an administrative reform, the amalgamation created the geopolitical framework of modern Nigeria, a union designed for imperial efficiency, not national cohesion.
Arbitrary Borders, Enduring Legacies
The colonial borders that defined Nigeria also divided peoples who shared languages, cultures, and histories:
- The Yorubawere split between British Nigeria and French Dahomey (Benin).
- The Kanuristraddled Nigeria, Niger, and Chad.
- The Tiv, Efik, and Ibibiopeoples found relatives separated by the Nigeria–Cameroon
These boundaries were drawn for imperial convenience, not African unity. Yet when Nigeria gained independence in 1960, its leaders, like most of Africa, accepted the inherited frontiers under the international principle of uti possidetis juris, reaffirmed by the 1964 OAU Cairo Declaration to prevent border conflicts.
Artificial though they were, these colonial lines became the foundation of Nigeria’s modern statehood, shaping its politics, economy, and enduring regional imbalances.
Author’s Note
The Berlin Conference did not invent Nigeria, but it made its creation possible. The doctrines of effective occupation and treaty-based sovereignty legitimised Britain’s use of charters, company rule, and diplomacy to assemble a colonial state.
From coastal annexations to company treaties and boundary negotiations, Nigeria’s formation was a process of commerce, cartography, and coercion. The borders drawn by imperial powers remain both an inheritance and a challenge, artificial in origin, yet essential to the identity and territorial integrity of modern Nigeria.
References:
Flora Shaw, “Nigeria,” The Times (London), 8 January 1897
Falola, Toyin & Heaton, Matthew. A History of Nigeria. Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Crowder, Michael. The Story of Nigeria. Faber & Faber, 1978.
