The struggle for Nigerian independence cannot be understood without appreciating the historical trajectory of the Nigerian people prior to British colonisation. Before the late nineteenth century, the ethnic groups that constitute modern Nigeria existed as largely independent political entities, each exercising sovereignty over their territories. In the North, the Sokoto Caliphate exerted influence over a large portion of the Savannah region, while the Kingdoms of Kanem-Borno, Ife, and Benin flourished politically, economically, and culturally. The Yoruba empire of Oyo, once dominant along the Guinea Coast, and the decentralized city-states of the Niger Delta, particularly those inhabited by the Igbo-speaking peoples, demonstrate the diversity and autonomy of precolonial Nigerian societies.
EXPLORE: Nigerian Civil War
The industrial revolution in Britain created a demand for raw materials, new markets, and capital outlets, prompting the British to expand into African territories. By the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the British, through a combination of military campaigns and diplomacy, consolidated control over Nigeria. This formalised control culminated in the 1914 amalgamation of the Northern and Southern Protectorates, creating a single colonial entity under British administration. The imposition of foreign rule disrupted pre-existing political structures, establishing the conditions that would later inspire nationalist movements.
Key Events and Figures
The emergence of Nigerian nationalism was shaped by the historical consciousness of intellectuals who studied both precolonial and colonial histories. The nationalists, figures such as Herbert Macaulay, Nnamdi Azikiwe, Obafemi Awolowo, Ahmadu Bello, Anthony Enahoro, Fumilayo Ransome-Kuti, and Joseph Tarkaa—were inspired by the past governance structures and achievements of their respective regions. Through historical study, they understood the mechanisms through which British colonialism had systematically undermined indigenous authority, and this knowledge informed their strategies for political mobilisation and resistance.
For instance, the Northern nationalist movement drew on the legacy of the early 19th-century jihadist leaders, Shehu Usman Danfodiyo, Abdullahi Fodiyo, and Muhammadu Bello. Ahmadu Bello, as the Sardauna of Sokoto, leveraged this historical inheritance to galvanise Northern support for independence. Similarly, the Eastern and Western regions drew on the historical memory of leaders such as King Jaja of Opobo, Nana of the Itsekiri, and the Aba Women’s Riot of 1929, which showcased the capacity for organised resistance among women and men alike.
Women nationalists played a pivotal role in the independence struggle. Inspired by historical examples of female leadership, such as Queen Amina of Zaria and Emotan of Benin, figures like Fumilayo Ransome-Kuti, Margaret Ekpo, and Hajiyya Gambo Sawaba actively engaged in political advocacy and resistance against colonial policies (Adesina, 2024). History thus provided them with both legitimacy and motivation to challenge British authority and societal constraints.
Economic and Social Changes
Colonial rule drastically transformed Nigeria’s social and economic landscape. British policies reoriented local economies to serve imperial interests, emphasizing cash crops, taxation, and labour extraction. This restructuring created social tensions that fuelled nationalist sentiment, as communities experienced the displacement of traditional governance structures and economic autonomy. Historical knowledge of precolonial trade networks and governance enabled nationalists to articulate an alternative vision for a self-determined Nigeria, rooted in indigenous institutions and practices.
The nationalist movement also capitalised on the historical understanding of cultural and political organisation. In the West, organisations such as the Egbe Omo Oduduwa—originally a cultural association, evolved into the Action Group, while in the North, the Jam’iyyar Mutanen Arewa transformed into the Northern People’s Congress. These organisations leveraged historical and cultural consciousness to mobilise support, educate the populace, and negotiate with colonial authorities.
Colonial Influence
British colonial strategies, particularly the “divide and rule” policy, heightened ethnic and regional divisions, creating challenges for nationalist unity. The unequal allocation of political representation under successive constitutions, Clifford (1922), Richard (1946), and Macpherson (1951), fostered tensions among the North, West, and East. The North, benefiting from a bicameral legislature and larger territorial control, gained disproportionate influence compared to the East, which remained under a unicameral system. Such structural inequalities were exacerbated by the artificial amalgamation of 1914, which forced diverse ethnic groups into a single political entity without considering their distinct historical and cultural identities.
Despite these challenges, nationalists drew upon historical knowledge to understand the origins and mechanics of colonial exploitation. By examining precolonial governance and the experiences of other societies that successfully resisted oppression, Nigerian leaders developed strategies for coordinated political action, mass mobilisation, and negotiation. The British-imposed inequalities necessitated both intellectual and practical engagement with history to craft a coherent nationalist programme.
Legacy Today
The impact of historical knowledge on Nigerian nationalism is evident in the country’s post-independence political and cultural landscape. The nationalist leaders’ ability to mobilise diverse communities relied heavily on an understanding of precolonial governance, cultural identity, and historical precedents of resistance. Historians such as Professor K.O. Dike played an instrumental role in this process by challenging Eurocentric misrepresentations of Africa’s past and promoting an informed sense of national consciousness. Through works such as African History and Self-Government (1953) and Trade and Politics in the Niger Delta 1830–1885 (1956), Dike demonstrated that Nigeria’s future depended on reclaiming historical agency and managing its own affairs.
Furthermore, the legacy of historical awareness is evident in contemporary efforts to engage citizens with their cultural and political heritage. Historical scholarship continues to inform debates on national identity, federalism, and social cohesion, reminding Nigerians that understanding the past is essential for addressing ongoing challenges of governance and unity.
READ MORE: Ancient & Pre-Colonial Nigeria
History played a decisive role in Nigeria’s struggle for independence, providing both intellectual tools and practical strategies for nationalist leaders. It enabled nationalists to comprehend colonial exploitation, draw inspiration from past leaders, mobilise women and men, and navigate complex socio-political landscapes. The nationalist struggle was complicated by ethnic, regional, and religious tensions, conditions exacerbated by British colonial policies—but historical knowledge provided a framework to manage these challenges and ultimately achieve independence on 1 October 1960.
The enduring lesson of this historical trajectory is that history is not merely a record of past events but a vital instrument for understanding and shaping political and social action. By engaging critically with their historical inheritance, Nigerian nationalists demonstrated the power of knowledge in transforming societies and reclaiming sovereignty.
Author’s Note
This article highlights the centrality of history in shaping Nigeria’s nationalist movement. Historical consciousness enabled leaders to draw lessons from the past, resist colonial domination, and mobilise a diverse population toward independence. Recognising the pivotal role of history in nation-building underscores the need for continued investment in historical scholarship, particularly in understanding Nigeria’s political, social, and cultural evolution.
References
Falola, Toyin & Heaton, Matthew M.; Nationalist Movements and Independence, 1929–1960. History of Nigeria, Cambridge University Press.
Ahmed, Iyanda Kamoru & Aisha Ibrahim Ningin: Historical Discourse on Nigerian Independence Constitution of 1960. Journal of Constitutional Law and Jurisprudence, Vol. 5, No. 1.
Johnson, Kofi; The Politics of Independence: A Case Study of Nigeria from 1960–1970. MA Thesis, University of North Dakota.
Crowder, Michael et al.; Nigeria 1960: A Special Independence Issue of Nigeria Magazine, Federal Ministry of Information.
Ajayi, Rotimi: The Anticolonial Struggle in Nigeria. Oxford Handbook of Nigerian Politics, 2018.
