Nigeria’s First Republic emerged from an independence settlement that placed population, parliamentary representation and regional political authority at the centre of the country’s democratic institutions. Within six years of independence, disputes over census figures, electoral procedures and the distribution of political power had contributed to a series of constitutional crises that preceded the military takeover of January 1966.
Nigeria gained independence from Britain on 1 October 1960 under a federal parliamentary constitution. The country initially retained the British monarch as its constitutional head of state, represented by a Governor-General. On 1 October 1963, Nigeria adopted a republican constitution, with Nnamdi Azikiwe becoming President while Abubakar Tafawa Balewa continued as Prime Minister.
The political tensions that eventually affected the First Republic had developed before the formal establishment of the republic in 1963.
Under the parliamentary arrangements inherited at independence, population figures were important in determining representation in the federal House of Representatives. They also influenced discussions about the distribution of federal resources among the regions.
The Northern People’s Congress (NPC), associated with Sir Ahmadu Bello and Prime Minister Balewa, drew much of its support from Northern Nigeria. The National Council of Nigeria and the Cameroons (NCNC), associated with Azikiwe, had a strong electoral base in the East. The Action Group (AG), led by Obafemi Awolowo, was particularly influential in the West.
Although these parties sought support beyond their principal regional bases, the geographical concentration of their political strength made disputes over population figures particularly important.
At independence, the NPC and NCNC formed the principal governing partnership, while the Action Group became the main federal opposition.
The Northern Region’s population-based parliamentary representation gave it an absolute majority of seats in the federal House of Representatives. Any substantial change in the recorded population of the regions could therefore affect the balance of political power.
The 1962 Census: A Disputed Count of Nigeria’s Population
Nigeria’s first post-independence population census took place in May 1962.
The preliminary figures placed the country’s population at approximately 45.26 million. Northern Nigeria was assigned about 22.01 million inhabitants, while the other regions together accounted for approximately 23.25 million.
These figures suggested that the North represented slightly less than half of Nigeria’s population, challenging the demographic balance underlying its existing parliamentary majority.
EXPLORE NOW: Democratic Nigeria
The implications extended beyond population statistics.
The census was expected to provide information relevant to parliamentary representation and the preparation of an updated electoral register ahead of the next federal election.
However, the results became the subject of intense political controversy.
Northern political leaders questioned the figures, while the reliability of returns from other regions also attracted criticism.
The census suffered from administrative and statistical difficulties, including incomplete returns from parts of the Western Region and disagreements about the plausibility of the population growth recorded in different regions.
Prime Minister Balewa subsequently announced that another census would be conducted.
The 1962 results were cancelled, leaving the government without an accepted post-independence population count.
The cancellation demonstrated how a national statistical exercise could become entangled with political competition when its results carried consequences for representation and the distribution of public resources.
It also left unresolved questions about Nigeria’s actual population and the reliability of the enumeration methods used.
The 1963 Census: A Second Count Deepens the Controversy
A new national census was conducted from 5 to 8 November 1963.
Unlike the 1962 exercise, which had extended over approximately two weeks, the second census was completed within four days. The shorter enumeration period was intended to limit opportunities for repeated counting and population movement during the exercise.
Responsibility for the census was assigned to a newly established Census Board that included representatives of the regions and international statistical expertise.
The exercise employed almost 150,000 enumerators and represented a substantial administrative undertaking.
Its results produced a considerably larger national population than the previous count.
The official figures recorded Nigeria’s population as 55,670,052, including approximately 29.8 million inhabitants in the Northern Region.
The Eastern Region was assigned approximately 12.39 million inhabitants, while the newly established Mid-Western Region was recorded as having approximately 2.54 million.
The results restored the North’s recorded absolute majority of the national population.
However, the new figures did not resolve the disagreement over Nigeria’s demographic balance.
Michael Okpara, Premier of the Eastern Region, rejected the results and challenged the reliability of the census.
EXPLORE NOW: Military Era & Coups in Nigeria
His objections included concerns about the enumeration process, the application of statistical tests and the treatment of disputed returns.
Sir Ahmadu Bello, Premier of the Northern Region, defended the figures and challenged accusations directed at the North.
The disagreements were complicated by the fact that the census produced different forms of information, including enumeration returns, sample-based estimates and information collected through a preliminary house-counting exercise.
The official population totals were compiled using these different sources of information. Disagreements over the reliability and treatment of the returns formed an important part of the controversy.
The political positions adopted by the regional governments also differed.
Samuel Ladoke Akintola’s Western Government accepted the results, while the Eastern Government continued to oppose them.
Dennis Osadebay, Premier of the Mid-Western Region, initially supported the Eastern Government’s objections but subsequently accepted the census figures.
His change of position left the Eastern Government increasingly isolated in its opposition.
The controversy therefore involved changing political alliances and competing regional interests rather than a uniform confrontation between Northern and Southern Nigerians.
The Federal Government ultimately accepted the 1963 figures, which became the official basis for subsequent demographic projections and national planning.
Nevertheless, official acceptance did not end disagreement over the reliability of the count.
The Supreme Court Challenge of 1964
The controversy surrounding the 1963 census eventually became a constitutional dispute.
On 18 May 1964, the Eastern Government instituted proceedings against the Federal Government, seeking declarations concerning the legality of the census arrangements and the acceptance of the disputed results.
The Supreme Court delivered its judgment on 29 June 1964 in Attorney-General, Eastern Nigeria v Attorney-General of the Federation, involving suits SC 231/1964 and SC 232/1964.
The Eastern Government’s case raised questions about the consequences of the census figures for parliamentary constituencies and monetary grants to the regions.
The proceedings also concerned the constitutional rights of regional governments, the powers of federal institutions and the circumstances in which the Supreme Court could exercise its original jurisdiction.
The legal proceedings demonstrated the constitutional significance of census figures during the First Republic. Population statistics were not merely administrative information; they could affect representation, financial arrangements and the relationship between federal and regional governments.
Although the Federal Government continued to use the accepted figures, the underlying political disagreement remained part of the wider struggle over representation and federal authority.
The 1964 Federal Election: Electoral Disputes Become a National Crisis
By 1964, Nigeria’s political landscape had undergone substantial changes.
The governing relationship between the NPC and NCNC had deteriorated, while the division within the Action Group had contributed to the emergence of Akintola’s Nigerian National Democratic Party (NNDP).
Two major electoral alliances emerged.
The Nigerian National Alliance (NNA) brought together the NPC, NNDP and other allies.
The United Progressive Grand Alliance (UPGA) comprised the NCNC, Action Group and additional opposition organisations.
The federal election was scheduled for 30 December 1964.
However, disputes over candidate nominations, the uncontested return of government-aligned candidates and electoral administration had already created serious disagreement about the conduct of the exercise.
Opposition parties complained that their candidates faced obstacles to participating in the election, particularly in parts of Northern Nigeria.
A contemporary United States government memorandum dated 30 December 1964 recorded complaints that 68 legislative candidates in the North were being returned unopposed.
The memorandum also documented the disagreement between President Azikiwe and Prime Minister Balewa over whether polling should proceed.
Azikiwe supported postponing the election, while Balewa maintained that it should take place as scheduled.
EXPLORE NOW: Biographies & Cultural Icons of Nigeria
The UPGA boycott disrupted voting in several constituencies, although polling proceeded elsewhere.
The resulting constitutional crisis delayed the formation of a new government. Following negotiations, Balewa was reappointed Prime Minister, while outstanding elections took place in affected constituencies in March 1965.
The disputed process demonstrated that the political difficulties facing Nigeria extended beyond disagreements over population statistics.
Electoral administration, candidate nominations, voter registration and the counting and declaration of results had become additional sources of conflict.
The controversy weakened confidence in the electoral process and intensified disagreements between the country’s major political organisations.
The 1965 Western Region Election: Political Violence Escalates
The Western Region had experienced serious political instability before the federal election.
The division within the Action Group in 1962 had produced a dispute over party leadership and the regional premiership.
The Federal Government declared a state of emergency in the region during the crisis. Akintola subsequently returned to office and established the NNDP, which became an important political ally of the NPC.
The Western regional election of October 1965 took place against this background of unresolved political rivalry.
The contest was marked by allegations of intimidation, electoral fraud and interference with opposition activities.
The declared results maintained Akintola’s political position, but opposition supporters challenged the outcome.
Political violence subsequently escalated across parts of the Western Region.
Attacks on political opponents, arson, destruction of property and other forms of violence became features of the crisis.
The period became associated with Operation Wetie, an expression particularly linked to attacks involving the burning of people or property.
The violence affected public order and intensified the wider political instability that had developed during the First Republic.
However, the Western crisis was not simply a consequence of the earlier census disputes.
It involved competing claims to regional political authority, the consequences of the Action Group division, relationships between federal and regional governments and the conduct of the political organisations involved.
The census controversies and electoral disputes were connected through the wider competition for political power, but they were not identical events.
January 1966: The Collapse of Nigeria’s First Republic
On 15 January 1966, a group of military officers attempted to overthrow Nigeria’s civilian government.
The coup involved the killing of senior political figures, including Prime Minister Abubakar Tafawa Balewa, Northern Premier Sir Ahmadu Bello and Western Premier Samuel Ladoke Akintola.
The officers who initiated the coup did not establish control of the country.
On 16 January 1966, Major-General Johnson Aguiyi-Ironsi, the senior military commander, assumed power as head of the military government.
The military takeover brought the First Republic’s civilian constitutional order to an end.
The preceding census and electoral controversies formed part of the political circumstances in which the coup occurred.
READ MORE: Ancient & Pre-Colonial Nigeria
By January 1966, Nigeria had experienced disputes over parliamentary representation, tensions within the governing coalition, political confrontations between federal and regional institutions, contested elections and serious violence in the Western Region.
These developments contributed to an environment of political instability.
The military intervention was a separate event involving decisions and actions taken by the officers responsible for the coup.
The collapse of the First Republic must therefore be understood within the wider history of Nigeria’s political and constitutional development between independence and January 1966.
Conclusion: The Political Significance of Nigeria’s First Republic
Nigeria’s First Republic experienced a series of interconnected crises involving population statistics, parliamentary representation, regional political alliances and electoral administration.
The cancellation of the 1962 census and the disputed acceptance of the 1963 figures demonstrated the difficulties of producing demographic information that could command confidence across the federation.
The 1964 federal election and the 1965 Western regional election exposed further problems involving political intimidation, candidate nominations, electoral procedures and disputed results.
These developments contributed to the deterioration of relations between competing political organisations and institutions before the military takeover of January 1966.
Disagreements over population and representation became entangled with political competition, while electoral disputes developed within an already unstable constitutional environment.
The history of the First Republic illustrates the importance of demographic information, electoral administration and constitutional authority in the functioning of democratic government.
Understanding their relationship provides a clearer account of the political crises that preceded the end of Nigeria’s first period of post-independence civilian rule.
Author’s Note
The collapse of Nigeria’s First Republic illustrates how disputes over public information, political representation and electoral procedures can become intertwined with wider struggles for political authority. The census controversies of 1962 and 1963 revealed the significance of demographic information in a federal parliamentary system, while the disputed elections of 1964 and 1965 demonstrated the consequences of political competition extending into electoral administration and public disorder. These crises developed alongside disagreements over regional authority and the distribution of federal power before the military intervention of January 1966. The enduring historical lesson is that the stability of democratic government depends not only on constitutional arrangements and elections but also on the institutions responsible for administering public affairs and resolving disputes within the constitutional order.
References
National Population Commission, Nigeria. Census Enumeration: Post-Independent Nigeria Censuses. Official account of the 1962 and 1963 population censuses, their reported figures and subsequent controversies.
Serra, Gerardo, and Morten Jerven (2021). Contested Numbers: Census Controversies and the Press in 1960s Nigeria. The Journal of African History, 62(2), pp. 235–253. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/S0021853721000438.
Supreme Court of Nigeria (1964). Attorney-General, Eastern Nigeria v Attorney-General of the Federation. Suits SC 231/1964 and SC 232/1964. Judgment delivered on 29 June 1964. Nigerian Supreme Court Cases.
United States Department of State (1964). The Situation in Nigeria. Memorandum dated 30 December 1964. Foreign Relations of the United States, 1964–1968, Volume XXIV, Africa, Document 358. Office of the Historian.
Suberu, Rotimi T. (2021). Nigeria in Search of a Credible Electoral Administration: Recent Reforms and Persistent Challenges. In Charles M. Fombad and Nico Steytler (eds.), Democracy, Elections, and Constitutionalism in Africa, pp. 331–360. Oxford University Press.
United States Department of State (1966). Editorial Note on the January 1966 Military Coup in Nigeria. Foreign Relations of the United States, 1964–1968, Volume XXIV, Africa, Document 361. Office of the Historian.
