The shots fired in several Lagos hold-ups in the early 1970s marked a painful turning point for a nation still reeling from civil war. What followed was not a single conspiratorial “wave” led by neat, uniformed gangs but a broader social shift: armed robbery moved from occasional, desperate theft into frequent, more violent, and often spectacular attacks on banks, traders and travellers.
That change grew out of converging problems. When the Civil War ended in January 1970 many areas, especially the former Eastern Region, were devastated. Farms and markets lay ruined, homes were gone and millions were displaced. Demobilisation programmes and reconstruction proceeded unevenly. At the same time, weapons that had been used in combat were dispersed into civilian life. These conditions combined with rapid urban growth to create fertile ground for violent crime.
Weapons and veterans
Arms proliferation after the war is well attested in contemporary reports and later studies. Firearms became easier to obtain than in peacetime; ex-fighters and others with wartime experience had both knowledge of weapons and, in some cases, no legitimate opportunities. While precise counts of weapons in circulation vary and exact figures are disputed, historians agree that the ready availability of firearms made robbery deadlier and more ambitious than previous waves of theft.
It is important to separate myth from record. Popular accounts sometimes attribute specific robberies to named former officers or describe highly cinematic scenes. Where reliable documentation exists, it is less theatrical: ex-combatants appear among the pool of people who turned to crime, but the historical record does not support neat tales of entire military-style gangs operating under formal ranks as a single nationwide phenomenon.
Poverty, displacement and urban strain
The post-war economic landscape amplified the problem. Tens of thousands of people lost livelihoods; many migrated to Lagos, Ibadan and other towns in search of work. Urban populations swelled faster than employment and housing could be provided. In that context, temptation and necessity met: criminal networks could recruit from an abundance of idle, displaced youth. Studies from the period and later research identify poverty, unemployment and social dislocation as core drivers of the 1970s crime spike.
Policing, punishment and public reaction
Police forces in many cities were stretched thin. Investigative capacity, manpower and intelligence gathering did not keep pace with the new scale and brazenness of offenders. Governments often pursued forceful, visible responses; the late 1960s and early 1970s saw the use of capital punishment and public executions intended to deter violent crime. These spectacles reflected public alarm but did not, by themselves, address the structural causes that produced offenders and opportunities.
Notorious figures and media attention
A number of criminals rose to national notoriety in this period. Ishola Oyenusi is one of the best-known names; he and several accomplices were captured and executed in 1971. Such figures were widely reported and, in some accounts, mythologised by the press. Later decades produced other infamous criminals, notably Lawrence Anini, whose terrorising of Benin City and surrounding areas occurred in the 1980s rather than the 1970s.
The media played a role in turning violent offenders into household names. Sensational headlines sold newspapers and shaped public perception; in turn the notoriety sometimes created perverse incentives for copycat behaviour. Still, the records show that criminal innovation in the 1970s was rooted less in celebrity and more in social opportunity—guns, crowded cities, and weak controls.
Economic ripple effects
Banks, traders and transport firms adapted quickly. Private security boomed; businesses invested in guards, fortified cash movements and altered operations to reduce risk. These expenses were real and long-lasting: higher insurance premiums and security costs affected the commercial climate and raised the overheads of doing business in Nigerian cities.
A more useful framing
Rather than a single “spectacular” decade led by charismatic gang leaders, the evidence points to a more diffuse, structural transformation. The post-war mix of arms, displacement and inequality created incentives and means for violent crime. Urbanisation and under-resourced policing allowed offenders to operate with relative impunity for a time, and media coverage ensured the era’s events lodged in public memory.
The 1970s rise in armed robbery was the product of conditions, not merely personalities. Leftover weapons, social dislocation, poverty and stretched law enforcement converted previously scattered theft into a pattern of organised, violent robbery. Effective responses therefore require more than punishment: they demand social and economic measures that remove the incentives for crime and restore community resilience.
Author’s note
This article highlights the main drivers behind Nigeria’s rise in armed robbery after the 1967–1970 Civil War: weapon availability, economic displacement, rapid urbanisation and weak policing. These structural forces, rather than the glamorised exploits of particular individuals, best explain how and why violent robbery became more common in the 1970s.
References
Rotimi, A. Perspectives on the Armed Robbery Offense in Nigeria (1984). Office of Justice Programs, statistical overview of the 1970–1976 rise in armed robbery.
Osifodunrin, P. A. Violent Crimes in Lagos, 1861–2000: Nature, Responses and Impact (University of Lagos thesis; includes discussion of Ishola Oyenusi and public executions).
Marenin, O. “The Anini Saga: Armed Robbery and the Reproduction of Ideology in Nigeria.” The Journal of Modern African Studies (1987) analysis of later high-profile criminality and state responses (context for Anini’s era).
EXPLORE NOW: Biographies & Cultural Icons of Nigeria
READ MORE: Ancient & Pre-Colonial Nigeria
