When militaries assume authority during war, their power is not automatically accepted. Legitimacy, or the perception of rightful authority, is earned through conduct, reasoning, and compliance with moral and legal standards. This perception drives civilian support, obedience, and long-term acceptance of governance, making legitimacy a central factor in wartime effectiveness.
What Determines Military Legitimacy?
Military actions are judged based on why a war is fought. Civilians and the international community assess whether the conflict is morally or legally justified. Forces perceived as defending the nation, protecting citizens, or responding to aggression are more likely to gain legitimacy.
EXPLORE NOW: Military Era & Coups in Nigeria
Conduct
How a military behaves during war is equally critical. Respecting civilian lives, avoiding unnecessary destruction, and adhering to international humanitarian law signal responsibility and fairness. Conduct that violates these principles undermines legitimacy, even if the military achieves victories.
Civilian Perception
Legitimacy is fundamentally about perception. Civilians evaluate whether military forces are acting in the public interest and judge them based on observed behaviour. This evaluation shapes compliance, support, and overall trust in military governance.
Legal and Moral Compliance
Adherence to international law is essential. Militaries gain credibility when they operate within recognised legal frameworks, demonstrate restraint, and enforce rules of engagement. Legality and morality reinforce public and international confidence in military authority.
Why Legitimacy Matters in Wartime
Civilian Cooperation
Legitimate forces secure civilian cooperation, access, and support. Populations are more willing to comply with regulations, provide information, and assist in stabilisation efforts when they perceive authority as just and lawful.
Post-Conflict Stability
Wartime legitimacy has long-term consequences. Armies perceived as fair and lawful facilitate smoother transitions to peace, aiding reconciliation and rebuilding. Conversely, loss of legitimacy can lead to unrest, resistance, and prolonged instability.
EXPLORE: Nigerian Civil War
Common Misconceptions About Military Rule
Victory does not automatically grant legitimacy. Success in battle does not guarantee civilian support; conduct and purpose matter more.
Civilian government failure does not equal military legitimacy. Military authority must still meet legal and moral standards to be accepted.
Military legitimacy in wartime is earned through lawful, ethical, and transparent conduct. Civilians are the ultimate arbiters, judging forces by why and how they act. Legitimacy ensures cooperation during conflict, effective governance, and long-term stability, shaping the outcomes of war and peace alike.
Author’s Note
Military legitimacy in wartime is about more than power—it is the perception that armed forces act lawfully, morally, and for justifiable purposes. Civilians judge legitimacy based on how military actions are conducted, whether they protect non-combatants, and whether they align with legal norms. Sustained legitimacy determines cooperation during war, the effectiveness of governance, and post-conflict stability. Understanding military legitimacy allows citizens, leaders, and policymakers to see why some armed authorities maintain trust while others fail, shaping both wartime outcomes and long-term peace.
References
Krick B, Petkun J, Revkin MR. Civilian Harm and Military Legitimacy: Evidence from the Battle of Mosul. International Organization. Cambridge University Press, 2025.
Williams WS. Legitimacy: The Lynchpin of Military Success in Complex Battlespaces. Oxford University Press.
Clements K. Introduction: Legitimacy and Peace Processes. Conciliation Resources.
