The first sign was not gunfire or proclamations, but absence. In Benin City, familiar authority vanished without warning. Offices that had issued instructions the day before fell silent. Soldiers appeared in streets where none had stood the previous morning. Ordinary residents quickly realised that decisions about movement, safety, and loyalty were no longer being made by the government they recognised. By early August 1967, the Nigerian Civil War had reached the Mid-West, and Benin City became its most unexpected frontline.
On 9 August 1967, Biafran forces entered the city under the command of Lieutenant Colonel Victor Banjo. The operation, known as Operation Torch, met little organised resistance. The military governor of the Mid-Western Region, Lieutenant Colonel David Ejoor, fled. Within hours, control of Benin City passed to Biafran administrators. For many residents, the war ceased to be something unfolding elsewhere. It arrived suddenly, reshaping daily life before its meaning could be fully understood.
EXPLORE NOW: Biographies & Cultural Icons of Nigeria
The occupation exposed an immediate tension. The Biafran force operating in the Mid-West was far from its base and surrounded by communities that were not ethnically aligned with its leadership. Edo, Urhobo, and Itsekiri populations now lived under an authority they had not chosen and that did not share their local structures of power. The historical record does not preserve detailed civilian testimonies from these weeks. What is clear, however, is that control rested on speed rather than consent. The city was held, but it was not anchored.
As days passed, the fragility of the occupation became increasingly evident. Biafran administrators faced the challenge of maintaining order in a region where loyalty could not be assumed. Military control alone was insufficient to stabilise the situation. In response, the Biafran leadership turned to symbolism as a means of political consolidation.
On 19 September 1967, a declaration was made. A new entity, the “Republic of Benin,” was announced, with Major Albert Okonkwo named as its head. The move was intended to legitimise Biafran presence in the Mid-West and present the occupation as a local political transformation rather than a military imposition. The declaration did not achieve its aim. The republic would exist for only 24 hours, overwhelmed by events already unfolding beyond the city.
While Benin City lived under occupation and brief declaration, the federal government was reorganising its response. The Biafran advance into the Mid-West represented more than a territorial incursion. It brought the war dangerously close to Nigeria’s western corridor and threatened the stability of the Western State. In response, the Federal Military Government created a new formation, the 2nd Infantry Division, with a clear mandate: expel Biafran forces from the Mid-West and restore federal control.
Command of the division was given to Lieutenant Colonel Murtala Muhammed. The counteroffensive that followed was rapid and forceful. Federal troops advanced towards Benin City along multiple routes, applying pressure from the north through Auchi and from the west through Ore. The confrontation at Ore proved decisive. There, Biafran forces came under sustained federal attack, and their position collapsed. What had begun as a bold expansion now turned into an irreversible retreat.
On 20 September 1967, federal troops entered Benin City. The “Republic of Benin” ceased to exist almost as soon as it had been proclaimed. Authority shifted once again, this time with lasting consequences for the course of the war.
Although overall command rested with Murtala Muhammed, Major Sam Ogbemudia played a significant role in the liberation of the city. The available historical material does not provide detailed accounts of individual unit movements or engagements during the entry into Benin City. Where operational specifics are unclear, they cannot be responsibly expanded. What is firmly documented is the outcome. Biafran forces withdrew eastward, abandoning their Mid-Western campaign.
As they retreated, Biafran troops crossed the Niger River and destroyed the bridge behind them, preventing immediate pursuit. The Mid-Western front collapsed. The threat of a westward Biafran advance towards Lagos was effectively neutralised.
Liberation, however, did not bring immediate calm. The period that followed was marked by instability and fear. Reports emerged of reprisals against individuals suspected of sympathising with Biafra. Among the most serious events associated with this phase were the killings in Asaba. While the occurrence of reprisals is documented in historical records, precise details and casualty figures are not fully established within the material available here and are therefore not elaborated upon.
Strategically, the recapture of Benin City marked a turning point in the war. It reversed one of Biafra’s most ambitious military operations and reaffirmed federal control over the Mid-West. Politically, it restored authority at a moment when that authority had been visibly challenged. Socially, it left deep and lasting scars. Communities that experienced occupation, declaration, liberation, and retaliation within a matter of weeks were permanently altered by the speed and violence of those transitions.
Benin City’s brief passage through Biafran control revealed a fundamental truth of the Nigerian Civil War. Power shifted not through debate or negotiation, but through movement, force, and timing. For ordinary people, the shape of daily life could be rewritten in a single day by decisions made far beyond their streets.
Long after the soldiers moved on, that lesson endured. Authority in wartime Nigeria was not abstract. It arrived suddenly, departed just as quickly, and left consequences that would shape memory, fear, and political identity for generations.
EXPLORE: Nigerian Civil War
Author’s Note
This article traces how Benin City moved rapidly from federal control to occupation, declaration, and liberation during the Nigerian Civil War, revealing how fragile authority became when war entered civilian spaces. It highlights the speed of military decisions, the limits of imposed legitimacy, and the lasting social consequences of sudden regime change in the Mid-West.
References
- John de St. Jorre, The Nigerian Civil War
- Alexander A. Madiebo, The Nigerian Revolution and the Biafran War
- Max Siollun, Oil, Politics and Violence: Nigeria’s Military Coup Culture
