The war did not begin in the Midwest with a declaration or a broadcast. It arrived quietly, on tyres and steel, in the hours before dawn.
On Wednesday, 9 August 1967, residents of Asaba were woken by the sound of trucks moving across the Niger Bridge. By first light, armed men were already on the roads, establishing control points and securing key locations. The Midwestern State, which had publicly committed itself to neutrality only weeks earlier, was being drawn into Nigeria’s civil war without warning and with little resistance.
EXPLORE NOW: Biographies & Cultural Icons of Nigeria
By nightfall, the Midwest was no longer neutral. It was occupied.
What followed was one of the most consequential episodes of the Nigerian Civil War, an invasion that reshaped the conflict’s trajectory, destroyed fragile regional trust, and left scars that endured long after the fighting moved elsewhere.
A REGION SEEKING SAFETY THROUGH NEUTRALITY
The Midwestern State entered 1967 in a precarious position. Created in 1963, it was Nigeria’s youngest region, ethnically diverse and economically valuable, with access to oil fields, ports, timber, and agricultural produce. Its leaders feared that any fragmentation of Nigeria would leave the Midwest vulnerable to domination by larger neighbours.
That anxiety shaped its political stance after the coups and massacres of 1966. At the constitutional conference held in September that year, the Midwest stood alone in advocating a strong federal system, rejecting both secession and excessive regional autonomy.
Its military governor, Lieutenant Colonel David Ejoor, publicly pledged that the Midwest would not become a battlefield. Neutrality, he argued, was the only way to protect the region from a war brewing between the federal government and the Eastern Region.
AN ILL PREPARED DEFENCE
In practice, neutrality offered little protection.
The Midwest lacked the military capacity to defend itself. Its forces were small, poorly equipped, and ethnically divided. Recruitment was minimal, arms were scarce, and control of weapons was fragmented among officers whose loyalties were often uncertain. Federal authorities in Lagos, wary of the region’s command structure, restricted access to arms and ammunition.
At the same time, everyday life continued. Trade with Onitsha remained active. The Niger Bridge stayed open. Intelligence warnings of unusual contacts between Eastern and Midwestern officers circulated, but no decisive countermeasures followed.
The conditions for surprise were firmly in place.
THE CROSSING OF THE NIGER BRIDGE
At approximately 3 a.m. on 9 August 1967, a Biafran force of roughly 3,000 soldiers and militiamen crossed the Niger Bridge into the Midwest. The operation was led by Lieutenant Colonel Victor Banjo, a Western trained officer who had aligned himself with the Biafran cause.
Moving in more than a hundred trucks and civilian vehicles, the force described itself as the “Liberation Army of Nigeria.” Its speed and coordination proved decisive.
Within hours, resistance collapsed. Benin City fell without sustained fighting. Warri was taken without incident. Auchi, Agenebode, and Okene followed. Only brief resistance occurred at Government House in Benin, and even that ended once it became clear that elements of the Area Command had already aligned with the invaders.
Governor Ejoor escaped narrowly, separated from his family and forced into a prolonged journey through rural communities, waterways, and back roads.
By the end of the day, the Midwestern State was effectively under Biafran control.
OCCUPATION AND DISILLUSIONMENT
For civilians, the invasion was deeply unsettling. The Midwest was not considered a front line. Yet soldiers suddenly occupied radio stations, police posts, schools, and markets. Authority shifted overnight. Rumours replaced reliable information.
Some Midwestern officers were issued Biafran uniforms, while others were quietly disarmed. What had begun as a swift military manoeuvre quickly took on the character of an occupation.
Rather than advancing immediately towards Ibadan and Lagos, Banjo halted in Benin City. A critical delay followed as he and Biafran leader Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu disagreed over governance. Banjo argued for a non Igbo civilian administrator to reduce local hostility. Ojukwu overruled him.
Those lost days proved decisive.
FEDERAL RECOVERY AND LOCAL RESISTANCE
As the Biafran advance stalled, federal forces regrouped. Units were recalled, new formations assembled, and defensive lines reinforced along western approaches. The opportunity to threaten Lagos directly slipped away.
Meanwhile, conditions within the occupied Midwest deteriorated. Senior civil servants, police officers, and broadcasters were detained. Lawlessness spread, particularly in the Niger Delta. Initial claims of liberation rang hollow as fear and resentment grew among the population.
Local resistance began quietly. In Benin and surrounding areas, civilians organised intelligence gathering, sabotage, and small scale attacks. Hunters provided weapons. Riverine communities used waterways to evade patrols and pass information. By late August, hundreds were involved, drawing the attention of both occupying forces and federal intelligence.
Reprisals followed. Casualties mounted. The occupation lost any remaining legitimacy.
THE FEDERAL COUNTEROFFENSIVE
By September 1967, the balance had shifted decisively.
Federal forces under Colonel Murtala Mohammed launched a coordinated advance, supported by artillery and armoured units. Towns fell in quick succession. Warri was retaken. On 20 September, Benin City fell less than a day after it had been proclaimed the capital of a short lived “Republic of Benin.”
Retreating Biafran forces looted public treasuries, abandoned equipment, and dispersed. Many never returned east.
AFTERMATH AND LONG SHADOWS
The end of the occupation did not bring relief.
In Asaba, following the arrival of federal troops, large numbers of civilian men were killed in events that survivors and scholars have consistently described as a massacre. Although never formally acknowledged, the killings left a lasting wound in communal memory.
Across the Midwest, suspicion hardened along ethnic lines. Ibos were targeted, displaced, or killed. Properties were seized. Families hid identities, fled towns, and erased traces of belonging.
Strategically, the invasion proved disastrous for Biafra. It unified previously ambivalent regions against secession, strengthened support for the federal government in the west, triggered a declaration of total war, and deepened international backing for Lagos. Militarily, it cost Biafra thousands of trained soldiers it could not replace.
For the Midwest, neutrality had failed. The region emerged traumatised, divided, and permanently altered.
The invasion lasted weeks. Its consequences lasted generations.
EXPLORE: Nigerian Civil War
AUTHOR’S NOTE
This article traces how the Midwestern State, despite its commitment to neutrality, became an unexpected battlefield during the Nigerian Civil War. It highlights the strategic miscalculations behind the Biafran invasion, the human cost of occupation and counteroffensive, and the enduring trauma left in communities such as Asaba. The events underscore how swiftly political assurances collapse under war and how civilian populations often pay the highest price.
REFERENCES
- Forsyth, Frederick. The Biafra Story
- Madiebo, Alexander. The Nigerian Revolution and the Biafran War
- Stremlau, John. The International Politics of the Nigerian Civil War
